Why there isn't a new republican revolution...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Jan 29, 2009.

  1. Maverick74, hapaboob, AAA....there were many who blindly supported Bush, mistake and blunder after another...

    It is so ridiculously simple to do, yet none of them do it.

    If your math was wrong before, don't use the same freaking math this time...

    But that's what they do, they use the same math, over and over again and continue to get the wrong answer...

     
    #21     Jan 29, 2009
  2. You think he personally prevented attacks in America?

    What a Loony Tunes you are...

    Warning! Danger Will Robinson...Danger!!!

    You are like the robot on Lost in Space with your continual fear card crapola...

     
    #22     Jan 29, 2009
  3. Have there been any attacks in the US since 9/11?
     
    #23     Jan 29, 2009
  4. If there were any attacks tomorrow, who would be to blame?

    Bush or Obama?

     
    #24     Jan 29, 2009
  5. Good lord. Since you imply in your above post, along with landis, that Bush wasn't responsible for keeping us safe, he wouldn't be responsible if we were attacked.

    This is like playing chess with a 5 year old.
     
    #25     Jan 29, 2009
  6. So Bush would not be responsible if we were attacked tomorrow?

    Who would be responsible?

     
    #26     Jan 29, 2009
  7. Mercor

    Mercor

    Clinton, of course.
     
    #27     Jan 29, 2009
  8. Spoken like a true republican moron...

     
    #28     Jan 29, 2009
  9. Funny thing is, your logic excludes the very guy you're trying to blame. And now you're stuck.
     
    #29     Jan 29, 2009
  10. You are stuck not answering the question...

    If there were any attacks tomorrow, who would be responsible and to blame for those attacks? Bush or Obama...

    Look, it ain't that hard, just like a multiple choice with two possible answers...

    I promise I won't make fun of you when you make the wrong choice...

    LOL!

     
    #30     Jan 29, 2009