why there is no hope

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mav88, Nov 19, 2012.

  1. Mav88

    Mav88

    and Canada almost broke up.

    you have no sense of history, countries like us break up all the time
     
    #11     Nov 19, 2012
  2. Mav88

    Mav88


    and that process grinds nations into poverty creating unhappiness for more
     
    #12     Nov 19, 2012
  3. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    My personal theory why so many on the left oppose a breakup.

    1)They don't want to go down in history as being at the helm when it happened.
    2) At least subconsciously they know they'll be losing the majority of the productive tax payers that actually pay for all their socialism.
    3) They'll no longer be in a position to continue forcing their liberalism down the rest of our throats.
     
    #13     Nov 19, 2012
  4. Again,this country will never be divided,some of you may try to start your own little revolutions(although I doubt it ) but you will get your asses handed to you worse then your confederate ancestors did.

    This country is a democracy,accept it or leave
     
    #14     Nov 19, 2012
  5. pspr

    pspr

    why there is no hope

    There's always hope. A big asteroid could break up in space and hit Washington, D.C., NYC, San Francisco and Los Angeles all at once and solve our problems for us. God works in mysterious ways so I'm counting on this miraculous event.
     
    #15     Nov 19, 2012
  6. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Actually it was set up as and used to be a Republic. It didn't really start going down the toilet, until it became a Democracy.
     
    #16     Nov 19, 2012
  7. Again Luke,we want people like you to leave.GO,GTFO,we dont need or want you.
     
    #17     Nov 19, 2012
  8. Mav88

    Mav88

    4) the parasite class would migrate to them in the ensuing chaos

    5) they have natural instinct to control others

    6) they know they can't be left alone with the checkbook
     
    #18     Nov 19, 2012
  9. Mav88

    Mav88

    Quebec just about voted themselves out

    democracies are not stable, there are many examples all around us

    we would simply get critical mass and vote out, we already have 47% and when things get really bad, we will polarize further

    you would not fight and you know it, but if we did it is rather stupid to assume things are just like 1862
     
    #19     Nov 19, 2012
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    We'll cross those impossible bridges when we get to them. In the meantime, buck up and get back to work. : )
     
    #20     Nov 19, 2012