Why Ron Paul is Out: He will stop the New World Order

Discussion in 'Politics' started by RCG Trader, Jan 16, 2012.

  1. I gotta give it to you pspr. Romney might be Doug Flutie, but I seriously doubt it. He is a dead duck in the general, and what is really sad is that more than half of the GOP knows this.

    Keep hope alive, bruh, keep hope alive!
     
    #31     Jan 17, 2012
  2. Ah, Brass, you did show up. Kill it man, educate me, pull this thing apart. Because if it is an any way correct, it is all over.
     
    #32     Jan 17, 2012
  3. But no sources refuting the OP's video. Hey man here I am, knock the video down. Simple, right? With my tin foil hat and all?
     
    #33     Jan 17, 2012
  4. Gotcha, you are saying that what Obama signed, was, in fact, Constitutional?
     
    #34     Jan 17, 2012
  5. Nah, I don't speak Farsi.....plus, I respect woman as equals. I guess that means I wouldn't like it much in Israel either.
     
    #35     Jan 17, 2012
  6. Brass

    Brass

    A fresh inductee into the New World Order:

    [​IMG]
     
    #36     Jan 17, 2012
  7. JCBLESS

    JCBLESS

    Yes he can win.

    I believe that if Americans can turn off their tv's and actually research and look at the historical perspective.

    Mitt-Mormon = Obama

    So the only person who can beat them both is Ron Paul

    it is whether the people want it bad enough.

    I would like to see Ron Paul 2012-2016

    and Rand Paul 2020

    True Change.
     
    #37     Jan 17, 2012
  8. For the record, there is no such thing as a New World Order

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Rc7i0wCFf8g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    Not sure what the hell he was talking about but my point stands.
     
    #38     Jan 17, 2012
  9. Brass

    Brass

    I think you have a better chance of being abducted by aliens than the joint probability of the above outcome.
     
    #39     Jan 17, 2012
  10. Nothing that can be refuted?
    The whole thing is a mishmash of conspiracy nuttery. I wouldn't know where to begin.
    Forget the video. It's true, as it says, that most candidates belong to the CFR. That's because the CFR is harmless and irrelevant, not because they have any power.
    A friend I made through a blog I used to keep kept sending me offers to their publication, whichever it is, I don't remember if it's Foreign Affairs or the other one. I know there's two, one of which is the training ground for the future torturers and mass murderers that folks like Trader666 and the rest of the conventional Republicans get all hot & wet over.
    No one really cares what's in those magazines. They're the kind of stuff you read when you have insomnia.
    Now, point by point:

    1 - The CFR, as noted above, doesn't really have any power. It's a debating society for useless academics.
    2 - The Bilderbergs? Even the freepers think that's a load of bs. Qaddafi is dead, Mubarak is under house arrest, Myanmar's leaders are making noises that they might actually allow real freedom, and Assad is hanging by a thread. The euro? Dead. Just waiting for the funeral. It's going the way of every other currency union that's ever been tried.
    3 - The EU getting together with the African Union and some future Asian Union and some future North American Union? Stupider than stupid. The EU is the only currency union in that list. The African Union is like the Organization of American States, except it does actually run some peacekeeping stuff that does have at least a surface effect. The Asian Union mentioned doesn't actually exist, and neither does the NA Union. Sheesh.
    4 - The only place the Amero ever gets mentioned is in these conspiracy jackoff sites. Think of some super-pale fat white boy who splits his time between porno and off-the-wall conspiracy sites. Would you believe some guy who wouldn't know what to do with a nekkid girl if she showed up on his doorstep wet & ready to go? C'mon....
    5 - The best explanation I ever heard for JFK's assassination, since of course that one had to be included, was that Oswald was aiming for Connally & missed. Connally was Sec'y of the Navy, which has jurisdiction over the Marines, where Oswald did his service. He wrote to the Navy to get his discharge changed, and was refused, with a form letter signed by Connally. Marina's first reaction to the JFK assassination was that he was shooting for Connally, not JFK. Which explains the uncanny accuracy: he wasn't aiming for JFK, and he missed. Case closed.

    In short, a steaming POS. As usual, with conspiracy stupidity.
     
    #40     Jan 17, 2012