Why Ron Paul is Out: He will stop the New World Order

You could always wear a tin foil hat while posting here.

 

Why bother? You are already leaving ET right after Obama loses the election to Romney.

 

The taking of phrases out of context, as uttered by some, to lend it evil underpinnings ("NWO"), Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs...

Really?

Powerful interests have habitually colluded when it suited them throughout history. This is a revelation? There has always been cause for some low-grade paranoia whenever power, greed and large amounts of money intersect. But the Internet has enabled reasonable observation to flourish to a feverish and schizophrenic pitch, with overactive imaginations confirming and validating one another in an infinite feedback loop, and each such cycle adding to the illusion of credibility.

 

Should the US government be able to interpret laws in secret, and then act on those secret interpretations sans oversight?

 

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)" target="_blank">NWO Conspiracy Theory</a>

 

That would fall under "excessive". : )

 

I'm proud of the New World Order, formerly known as the Spirit of AntiChrist... much of the Book of Revelation is about them!!

 

I'm disappointed that they left the Founding Fathers out of the conspiracy for putting the Suspension Clause in the Constitution which actually does allow the suspension of habeas corpus.

 

Maybe you'd be happier in Iran? They might even give you free internet access based on what you've posted in P&R alone.

 

If this thread has interested you, I think this book will too.



The CFR's Plan to :
Destroy America's National Sovereignty
Subvert the U. S. Constitution
via NATO and the ATLANTIC COMMUNITY
Put the U. S. under Control of a
Socialist-Dominated World Government

"The purpose of this book is to present, by direct quotations, the
views of the leading figures in the Council on Foreign Relations
and how such views are now affecting the Foreign Policy of the
United States.
The authors believe that the policies advocated by the Council
on Foreign Relations, and being carried out by CFR members in
high positions in the Government, are not in the best interests of
this nation.
However, it should be remembered that the Council on Foreign
Relations is composed of 1400 members, persons of high prominence
in industry, education and communications . The authors do
not mean to imply that the foreign policy views of the CFR are
shared by all 1400 of its members ."



http://www.scribd.com/doc/25334085/Americas-Unelected-Rulers-by-Kent-Phoebe-Courtney#logout