poorer people have a higher propensity to consume a tax reduction for them is more efficient at increasing demand perhaps thirty percent so. which is worse reducing tax or getting into debt.
i dont no. i have trouble following all this teen texting looking stuff and run on sentences from somone who thinks they R an econ wiz after a few college classes
Here in the U.S. the "poor" don't pay income taxes. Therefore their taxes cannot be reduced. Yes they pay all kinds of other taxes and fees but they are hard to quantify. That's why they collect sundry gifts from the government which we all pay for including them. The right hand gives while the left hand takes. Forget theory and for once consider the actual situation. I know it will be difficult,but try just this once.... Please? Pretty please?
"The Solution" involves (1) cutting government spending, (2) incentivizing growth through reduction of taxes. Everything outside that is just "circle jerk economics/political spew"...
Consider if you will Q.Which is supposedly the richest country in the world ? A. the usa Q. which is the richest state in the usa ? A. California Q.So how come California is teatering on the brink of bankruptcy ? A. People dont want to pay their taxes. What happens in Cali today spreads to the rest of the USA tomorrow. Worrying is it not ? No social or public services because there is no money means big trouble. So be good boys and girls and pay your damn taxes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, either that or... HAVE TAX-DOLE RECIPIENTS GET A FARKIN' JOB AND PAY THEIR OWN WAY IN LIFE.... Our problems are not "paying too little taxes"... after all, Fed and state taxes already take 45% of our GDP... HOW MUCH FRICKIN' MORE DO YOU WANT? "THE REAL PROBLEM", is too much in the way of "benefits"... payouts to buy policical favor...
How much is enough, 50%, 60%, 75%? One of the things I love about the FairTax idea, is that even though it's revenue neutral, set at 23% (retail sales tax), if the government wanted to raise taxes, they'd have a hell of a lot harder time convincing EVERYONE that it must go up. Once their revenue is capped, the expense side of the balance sheet can be attacked next, and maybe the 23% can come down.