Make sure to write letters to Bernanke thanking him for destroying the U.S. dollar, and also an equal shout out to Congress and The White House for supporting farm subsidies that include paying farmers to grow crops, to not grow crops, and to give the corn/ethanol industry a 51 cent per gallon subsidy to produce ethanol (when we could import sugar cane-based ethanol from Brazil far more cheaply, but have decided to levy a 54 cent per gallon tariff on it; so a 51 cent subsidy + a 54 cent tariff equals $1.05 if my terrible math is correct. Brazilian sugar cane is $1.05 per gallon cheaper than U.S. corn based ethanol, without out all the other inflationary through puts), which simply means less cotton, soybeans, wheat, rice and a variety of other crops are planted while agri-biz turns food into fuel. Corn is the most water and fertilizer intensive crop, too, so that's why fertilizer is going to the moon, putting further inflationary pressures on the supply chain for food and all things ethanol. Also, make sure to tell Congress and The White House to make sure they extend tax exemptions and breaks on producers of crude oil, and to ramp up more military spending in Iraq. They are doing a real bang up job, these elected officials of ours. And life is great for them with cushy jobs for their relatives (a lot of lobbyists in that mix), lifetime health care, fat pensions, and government paid gasoline cards (along with many tax payer supplied vehicles). Isn't this a great time? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7362343.stm The end of cheap clothes is near By Jorn Madslien Business reporter, BBC News Food prices have shot up in response to a surge in crop prices. Now consumers should get ready for clothes prices to follow suit. Cotton production in Georgia US cotton farmers are switching to more lucrative crops Garment makers are seeing demand shrink as consumers in the US and Europe are cutting back on spending. US cotton consumption is set to fall 6.5% from last year to less than a million tonnes whilst EU consumption is expected to fall 11% to about 460,000 tonnes, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) predicts. At the same time, they are hit by more expensive raw materials and by soaring oil prices, which make their factories more expensive to operate and which pushes up the cost of shipping to foreign markets. In India, the weaving industry is in crisis. In China, the textile sector is squeezed. And, yet again, the root cause of their problems can be found in America. US markets Cotton prices 2008/09 - 80 cents per pound (projected) 2007/08 - 74 cents per pound Source: ICAC In the US, ever more cotton farmers are switching to more lucrative crops - soybeans, corn, and wheat - whose market prices are rising even faster. The prices of these crops have been pushed higher by a mixture of subsidies, growing demand from biofuel producers and market speculation. "Cotton is taking its cue from whatever the other [commodity] markets are doing," according to a US commodities broker. "They set the tone for a lot of the things taking place in this market." Costly cotton As a result of the shift by farmers, "the cotton harvested area in the USA is projected to decline by a further 15%" in the year ahead, predicts the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC). Cotton production is still rising in many countries, but not fast enough That would bring the cotton acreage in the US to 9.5 million acres, down from 10.8 million in 2007 and from whopping 15 million acres in 2006. "It is obvious that [cotton] prices will be higher," ICAC says. This year, global cotton prices are set to rise more than 8% to 80 cents per pound, ICAC predicts. Financial market professionals think the rise could be even steeper. May cotton futures currently trades at about 71 cents per pound on the Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE. The December futures trade at about 83 cents per pound. "I don't think we've had markets this wild since 1995, and we're in an environment where it could be with us for several years," says Mike Stevens from finance house Swiss Financial Services in an interview with Penton Insight. Demand outstrips supply Cotton shortages first emerged last year, when global demand for cotton exceeded global supply by about a million tonnes. Cotton worker in China Chinese clothes manufacturers are struggling In spite of the US shift towards competing crops, this year, the global cotton harvest is set to grow 3%, as major producer regions such as China, India, Australia, Brazil and West Africa are raising production. Globally, supply growth is thus outstripping demand growth; cotton mill use is set to grow by just 1% this year. But even so, supply is not growing fast enough. This year's production level is expected to peak at 26.9 million tonnes of cotton, compared with demand for 27.5 million tonnes, the ICAC predicts. Expensive clothes But costly cotton is only one factor hitting clothing manufacturers. Primark Cheap clothing may become a thing of the past "It all comes down to energy," explains Bradley George, head of commodities and resources at Investec Asset Management. "We are basically short of power in the world right now." Hence, it is not only a question of whether land should be used to grow crops for food or cotton. It is also a question of how much energy should be used to produce clothes in factories. Fertiliser costs are also soaring, adding to raw material costs, and the credit crunch is adding to the squeeze as low-margin clothes manufacturers are finding it harder to raise finance. The wages paid to factory workers have risen too, especially in China. Manufacturers in India and China, as well as in many other parts of South East Asia and Central Asia are already feeling the pain. In the end, they will either have to raise prices for the clothes they make, or go under - which in turn will reduce supply. For consumers in Europe and the US the outcome is certain: prepare to pay more for clothes in the years to come.
Also, from Roger Cohen: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/opinion/24cohen.html?hp " Right now, the biofuel market is being grossly distorted by subsidies and trade barriers in the United States and the European Union. These make it rewarding to produce ethanol from corn or grains that are far less productive than sugarcane ethanol, divert land from food production (unlike sugarcane), and have dubious environmental credentials. What sense does it make to have a surplus of environmentally friendly Brazilian sugar-based ethanol with a yield eight times higher than U.S. corn ethanol and zero impact on food prices being kept from an American market by a tariff of 54 cents on a gallon while Iowan corn ethanol gets a subsidy? âIt would make a lot more sense to drop the tariff, drop the subsidy, and allow Brazilian ethanol into the United States,â said Philippe Reichstul, the chief executive of a biofuel company in São Paulo. âPressure on U.S. land will be slashed.â
In a perfect & logical world, yes. However, there are too many U.S. corn and sugar producers with too much to lose.
Do you ever change your rhetoric? Really, what's your point? Besides keeping yourself in the dark. If Bernanke was fired tomorrow and replaced with someone else, you will probably jump in joy and make 3 threads on ET exclaiming that "justice has prevailed". Meanwhile, in reality, nothing will change.