Why isn't anyone discussing what is going on?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by NTB, Jan 17, 2006.

  1. maxpi

    maxpi

    LOL
     
    #51     Jan 20, 2006
  2. NTB

    NTB

    Still short, thanks TheDr.
     
    #52     Jan 21, 2006
  3. NTB

    NTB

    Covered half on no follow through from Friday. Will sell again if we don't move much higher from here. No follow-through but bounce is not impressive yet.
     
    #53     Jan 22, 2006
  4. rcj

    rcj

  5. NTB

    NTB

    RCJ,

    I would have expected more after Friday's move in New York. That's one reason that I'm covering a bit...
     
    #55     Jan 22, 2006
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    This has nothing to do with our markets. In fact, if anything it's bullish if people are moving their money out of the Asian equity markets and into ours. The money has to go somewhere right?
     
    #56     Jan 22, 2006
  7. NTB

    NTB

    Wealth is destroyed when markets move down. Not shifted into other products or markets.
     
    #57     Jan 22, 2006
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Not true. Wealth is transferred, not destroyed. Check out eco 101. Money supply is not affected by gyrations in the mkt, it simply shifts capital from one party to another. Think about it, every transaction has a buyer and a seller. The buyer transferred capital to the seller. This is really not that difficult a concept to grasp. When someone sells a stock, the money does not travel into a black hole and disappear. It goes into someone's bank account.
     
    #58     Jan 22, 2006
  9. NTB

    NTB

    So is wealth isn't created when markets move up? Markets don't necessarily move down from actual 'sales'. When the market gaps down 300 points without any trades has wealth been transferred or destroyed?
     
    #59     Jan 22, 2006
  10. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Neither. Do you know what mark to market accounting is? Please say yes or this is going to be a really long night and I just don't have time to teach an ECO 101 class right now. I'm not trying to be condescending, just blunt.
     
    #60     Jan 22, 2006