all that matters is as follows: does it make sense can i understand it does it work can i do it can i keep doing it if the answer to any of the above is NO..then there is something drastic wrong with the way you think..for..even a child could understand what i have explained about trading the MES..but then again..a child will not be a member of the "so many asses laden with books"..YET !!!
does it make sense --> it makes perfect sense can i understand it --> yes, I can, finally does it work --> yes, it seems so, but too small a sample to be sure yet can i do it --> yes I can, still need some fine tuning but yes can i keep doing it --> I don't see why not I would add, Is it simple? yes it is, very simple indeed
the man was frail..moved like a snail but mind was fast..all in the past he wrote some word..to most absurd but to small few..it confirmed "i knew" to Madame he spoke..it was no joke of how they ruin..the merry tune of course he knew..more than can chew for it intent..to keep minds bent you see dear sir.. it's not a blur if open eyes..and look to skies for up above..the white tailed dove in sky so blue..does soar so true to really see..or not to be one must off load..the shite so bold for History say..like yesterday today will be..no different see the fat arse boys..with all their toys will twist the brain..down to the grain but know you this..it is not piss avoid the bliss..with the OBVIOUS
For the layout described in THIS post, and the quote above... How many bars are required per chart to see what "IT" is or what needs to be seen? I am asking this for a specific reason which may not make sense to most. I.e., say you could only see 2-5 bars per chart, would that information be sufficient to find entries.
So I haven't been following your discussion but here is my take, based on my PRICE-BAR-ONLY methods/techniques. Out of the 9 pics... (I'll use Row:Column notation to point them out...) 3 of them are inside bars, and a definite NO without further inputs. R1:C3, R2:C3, R2:C4 R1:C2 suggests a bounce or a failed break. To me this is a long, with entry at or below OPEN of the 2nd bar, with a stop 3 tics below the low of first bar. R1:C5 and R2:C2 are continuation patterns. I will leave the precise entry/stop for you to decide. R2:C2 appears to be the better of the 2. The other 3, without more input, would be gambling. No trades here. R1:C1, R1:C4, R2:C5 That was fun!