Why Is The Obvious Not So Obvious?

The "-" is not required.

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/500696/pre-requisite-vs-prerequisite

 

Obviously I missed the lecture

Duty of Care:

1. existence of a legal duty that the defendant owed to the plaintiff
2. defendant's breach of that duty
3. plaintiff's sufferance of an injury
4. proof that defendant's breach caused the injury (typically defined through proximate cause)

"What relevance does the above lecture have in relation to trading":

1. Under "normal" market conditions my expectation is, that the market continues to operate in that direction - or if proved wrong does not go into that direction
   
2. point 1. fails - the market does not operate as "normal" conditions or expectiations would suggest
3. [Obvious] Breach of the potential Stop Loss of one of tow sides (Buy or Sell - you may choose)
4. The breach of Stop Loss is followed by immediate [...through proximate cause] signs of weakness

 

if in different needs, participants will have to act differently to reach their goal - so tactics of market participants in varying markets may differ.

 

Some smart guy once said, "all u need is ur 2 eyes..a simple chart..and a straight edge.."

One other guy also said something about the "BE method," I.e., using your brain and eyes.

Another mention of the prerequisite was, "Chart reading skills are a pre-requisite to successful trading." Maybe this is meant in the LITERAL sense, as in the WAY you read the chart?

I think the above ideas, lend to the notion that, it is all in the way we PERCEIVE the information that may be key.

Our mind/eye connection does play tricks.

 

My 2 cents:

• deaf persons inner ear is affected, coordinating the sense of balance; the eyes compensate for orientation
  
• blind persons have an intact inner ear - coordinacting the sence of balance
• deafblind persons suffer from both disadvantages - but can use a blindman's stick

maybe not really smart, but that is my answer

 

invest

 

I have had a few thoughts on point C: what every body focus on (me included) is better odds of price moving in your favor, so most of the focus is deciding between going long or short. I am coming to think that while you need to chose between the two, I am moving the focus from where to place the entry order to where to place the stop order (weather it is a physicals order or a mental one), it may seem obvious and a consequence of the location of the entry order but in fact I think it is different as I move the focus from where I think the price will get before moving away to where the price should not get for my hypothesis to true. does it make sense?

 

E48..if the above are all correct..then what could be so obvious that it is not so obvious ?

 

sounds logical..if "secret knowledge" is available to some..in what format do you think this knowledge is..for example..is it insider news which of course happens and some have paid the consequences..is it the workings of new technologies..or what else do you think it might be..to be of use to the "plebs" ?

 

now..this is where it gets interesting..

Deaf Blind Can Fall

Duty
Breach
Causation
Foreseeability

unless you can fully explain all of the above to the professor..off the top of your head..without thinking twice about it..then you are next in line for the dime to ring home