It's not spam. Get over it. Every ET member is free to post as long as he respects the guidelines. Jack's posts are on this thread's topic: he answers the OP's question. He claims and demonstrates that the market's signals are obvious to those who take the time to learn the market's vocabulary.
Is your FFT Fast & Furious Trading by any chance!! = NO by the looks of things lately..with the arseholes who have arrived..we might name it Fukin Fools Trading TO will be very busy for the next few weeks..as some serious testing to do with new setup..which now looks like it will assist with some spread trading as well..but u forget about spreads for now..and just concentrate on one setup..and not something liked the fuked up looney has pswd will be sent to more..but not yet..have some minor bugs still hanging around that i need to crush patience is a virtue..and always..always..use MTFA TO
There are a lot of links that pop up if you type in "paid forum posters" on google. Makes you wonder a little more about what you read & who you think wrote it. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the Jack Hershey posts weren't really written by Jack Hershey. I haven't read too many of them, but I remember a couple times thinking, "Wow..........that sounds really simple & understandable compared to some of his other posts". I try to be real careful about information I read on the internet nowadays unless it's purely factual information like "what time does the market open"?
Look at these posts from "Jack" made 8 minutes apart. The first one is riddled with grammatical errors; the second one is almost perfect. POST FROM JACK 6-24-12 12:23 PM Thank you for your attention to detail. My post was correct and how I did the MADA using a system. This means to open on tomorrow (25JUN12) is short on bar 1. you're probably trading on the next faster fractal which is mor profitable still. Just s a footnote, there are some people here who think that, in the past, there are no references to calls being made. these people are just expressing and erroneous belief probably based on thier lack of attention or lack of search skills. Periodiically I et these people straight by referring to very good sourses they can use to coerrect their erroneous statements. Now they can just go to my posts that previously corrected their statements. For moderators, it may be a good idea to delete these erroneous posts that keep slipping into threads. Anyone can set up an Excel and put in bar infomation on each bar mentioned. your objective is to use the data however you wish to extablish a baseline of how to measure trading performance. From enough data points you can determine how to estimate and fill in the variables of the compound interest formula. This formula is used to understand better how contracts are added to a system in order to grow capital. *************************************************** POST FROM JACK 6-24-12 12:31 PM The opening post states an erroneous factor in the use of the Cash Cow. The Cash Cow operates form leading indicators of price on an intraday trading fractal. Others have pointed out that the data and results are screwed up. The theory foundation of the Cash Cow is how to trade a two line indicator. The indicators were formed using the six cases of the two line indicator. An example of a misuse of this indicator system is the SPM. The author of SPM did not use any of the six cases to determine his signal for SPM. He could not accept any input on how to make SPM perform on an effective or efficient level. So SPM disappeared from the landscape.
well MK..as JH is now exposed for what he really is..and that is a chancer of the highest order..we will pick up where we left off..before the bunch of failed academic arseholes arrived if they keep interfering..then they will get more of same..maybe even worse TO
MK..this is more like the cash cow that JH operates..notice how dried up it is and..i believe this is how the spiderman arrived at the trading competition
TO is going to make a prediction for the open tomorrow..keep watching..for..i can guarantee u..with 100% certainty..that TO will be CORRECT