So, 100% is not my win rate. Closer to 85 is more like it. All I do is examine the winners. All the possible data. 99% Of the data I collect is useless and leads nowhere. I convinced any logical approach, evidenced based, will keep you in the game. Who, what, when, where and how did I win. Not so simple doing manuel data entry into a spreadsheet. Old school to say the least.
For the same price, you’re much better off with Multicharts, which is 100% broker and data vendor independent. Why get hostaged into NT brokerage? Makes no sense. That’s a horrible business model which will lead to their demise, as competing and open source platforms aim to offer flexibility.
Exactly. I never understood why people nickel and dime around this shit. I purchased lifetime licensing and additionaly spent 5-10k on programming and customization. If anything, I feel like I’ve cheated them, as they constantly support and update the software for no extra cost.
Maybe because ET is not about elite traders but rather people who cannot really afford to trade because of financial reasons. If you are a real trader hardware or software prices are irrelevant. You make every day more money then they can save buying a second hand or refurbished PC or trying to spent less then $500 on it.
Are you serious???? What about all issues with partial fills??? Ninja managed approach easily handles them all. After all these years, I still can not believe how cheap and good Ninja is. P.S. Coming from serious algo trader with substantial capital under management.
I have been here for a while again...but Thanks..I saw your handle and thought that you are not on the other parts of ET...what part of ET do you hang out in? ES
This is a coding issue, as I’ve never experienced it with MC. I’ve found it to very robust and stable at automated execution. If NT earned your trust, I wish you the best. Just stating my opinion based on them trying to corner clients into their brokerage. P.S. Also an experienced, and highly leveraged algo trader