Why is bloomberg so freaking fast?

Discussion in 'Trading Software' started by gmst, Apr 25, 2013.

  1. misaki

    misaki

    @gmst:

    This guy's hilarious.

    Last I know, 5-6 ticks per second = 1 tick per 180 milliseconds. Some "hft" indeed.
     
    #21     Apr 25, 2013
  2. MattSF

    MattSF

    Got to be a typo on HFT's part.
     
    #22     Apr 25, 2013
  3. misaki

    misaki

    You have no idea how hilarious that lie is.
     
    #23     Apr 25, 2013
  4. gmst

    gmst

    HAHA.

    Yes, I was trying hard to not take him seriously, but finally I got enough of him. He has been trolling non-stop from Monday onwards.

    He ruined this thread as well. Btw, thanks for the link. I will read that thread - sounds interesting.
     
    #24     Apr 25, 2013
  5. misaki

    misaki

    You're welcome. ;)
     
    #25     Apr 25, 2013
  6. hftvol

    hftvol

    Obviously it was. From the context it should have been clear that it referred to millions. That includes deserialization and a full merge-sort algorithm that handles multi symbol feeds. I have not seen such numbers at tickzoom, any event processing engine nor kdb but then I am not a k expert. And it referred to the testing and profiling engine in comparison with matlab, r, or other vectorized engines without the slightest regard to hft.

     
    #26     Apr 25, 2013
  7. Cant compare Amibroker to Bloomberg.

    AB is pretty much a one man show , no? And its not a full blown information terminal.

    Suspect 95% of bloomberg get done on the server side.

    AB is very fast even doing everything on the users pc.
     
    #27     Apr 25, 2013
  8. Yeah, BB is a full blown professional terminal for larger firms and pretty pricey, around $1700/month.

    AFAIK, AB is a three men show. Anyway I just love its power and speed.
     
    #28     Apr 26, 2013