1. the algo was correct. the polls were skewed with ridiculous samples. One pool had obama up 21 points because it far over sampled democrats.. 2. this thread has caused (I mean documented) hillary to be downgraded from inevitable to shes in trouble and the democrats are talking to biden. .
They would be hard pushed to find anyone of integrity and so are left to the usual sell out types. Money gets everywhere and buys its opinion, which is then worthless. Banana Republic politics where money and threats create the new reality ! Truth didn't stand a chance.
When a republican is president, we're told that it's beyond inappropriate for him to have any litmus tests for selecting a supreme court nominee. If the nominee has any pre-existing views on divisive subjects, democrats claim it disqualifies the nominee. What about when there's a democrat president? "Hillary Clinton was asked a specific question about Court nominations during the Democratic debate on MSNBC on Feb.4. She promised that her nominees will have to be “loud and clear” that they will vote to overturn the Court’s campaign finance decision. Only a few candidates have included the Constitution and Court appointments on the “issues” page of their campaign websites. Hillary Clinton recently said she had “a bunch of “litmus tests” for Court appointees." =Americanthinker.com They can get away with this because republicans let them get away with anything.
I'll add one thing to this. If the democrats think that Supreme Court decisions like the one on campaign finance can be overturned, then homosexual marriage is not a settled issue, either.
Wealth redistribution and the demonizing of unequal outcomes, in spite of all of their ills and evils, is a politically EASY sell to the hoi polloi. That's why we have it. And that's why so much of the world lives in poverty.