I'm not saying that. I'm saying that the reality is all politicians lie, and always have. If that was the sole reason to disqualify them then we'd have no politicians. Which is impossible because warlords and the like would simply fill their shoes, and they lie, too. Bottom line, you need a different criticism of Hillary.
Assuming no major surprises on either side going forward, my guess is that she will get nominated. If she gets nominated, my guess is she will win the election. If she wins the election, my guess is that heads will both spontaneously combust and explode here in P&R. And you don't have to guess how enjoyable that would be for me.
Lol @ heads exploding, but no, they won't. They would have exploded after the reelection of Obama if they were ever going to. Should it go the way you outline, which is quite plausible, you'll simply have to continue to endure years more of their end-of-the-world-ism.
I think Hillary would be the best candidate for me, her husband certainly was, and I voted against him because I couldn't stand his lies.
Which brings us to the kind of lie Americans can't stand... no doubt owing to our Puritanical roots, lying about sex is a very objectionable kind of lie. But in truth, how many American men really care, aside from political leverage, if men in power get free blowjobs? I mean, if it's "awesome" that teen boys, minors, can get sex from their teachers (a fantasy many here have had)...
no, it's not what the lie is about, and Bill Clinton told plenty of lies about things other than sex. And if sex is no big deal, why lie about it? For that matter, emails are no big deal, so why lie about it? It's obvious she is covering up, you have to be a blind follower to not at least admit that. But like a typical democrat, you can never admit any fault with your current democrat god that you worship. the lie about cattle futures should be enough to disqualify her for any public office.
Because in America it is a big deal. But what red-blooded American male really thinks a free blowjob is a BIG deal (politically)? Anyway, politicians lie, always have. If it's discovered that the Hillary email thing actually broke some laws, and her fingerprints are on it, then you have something real.
It's not about never admitting faults of a preferred candidate. It is the overwhelming list of faults of the alternative candidates who are running on the other side. The cost/benefit comparison is so skewed that the choice is a no-brainers for everyone other than the no-brainers.
"If" being the middle word of life. Yes, then there would be fallout. But I see no reason to jump that conclusion just yet. Of course, the Right Wingsters have already swan dived...