A heavily-edited Bible. All the uncomfortable stuff has been deleted. Also known as the PAC Bible (Pick And Choose). All the right-wingers down here have a copy.
So a few guys spoke favorably of him and they were given instant credibility, but the many who spoke critically of him are motivated solely by politics? This is old news, Kerry is history hopefully, but the way the left creates these fantasies and insists that they are truthful is fascinating. It is timely in the sense that we will see many articles asserting that Bill Clinton was a great president and was unfairly targeted by Ken Starr. Or that hillary clinton was a whiz as Secretary of State. When the truth comes out, like it did with that Clinton Foundation book, their media allies will rush to their defense, just like that liar George Stephanopolous did. I'm not a big fan of plenty of republican candidates either, but surely the democrat party can do better than Hillary, Bernie Sanders and party boy Martin O'Malley?
PELOSI: ‘THE CLINTONS WILL HAVE TO ANSWER FOR THE FOUNDATION’ Pelosi said, “Well, the Clintons will have to answer for the foundation. But I would imagine that President Clinton’s participation in that event increased the take and money spent at the foundation is for a very good cause as well,” adding , “but no question, it raises questions they’ll have to answer.”
Battenfeld: How Martin O'Malley can beat Hillary Clinton "There are a few signs of hope for O’Malley. Though Clinton has cruised so far without having to actually answer to the voters, she’s shown signs of weakness. A new Quinnipiac poll showed a stunning 53 percent of voters don’t trust her and more than half of independent voters don’t like her. That’s got to make Democrats nervous."
Money rules right ? Especially in the US. The Party with the biggest war chest gets in. Greasing the wheels of power with money ( bribes ). Talking of money, the odds being offered by canny book makers are:- Hillary 1/10 Jeb Bush 5/2 Looks like a foregone conclusion guys.
You realize, of course, that you are engaging in outright troll behavior. When will you let this one go? Or will you pass it down to your children? Seriously, criticize to your heart's content. But please aim for at least passing relevance.
"I never saw, heard of, or participated in any Swift boat crews killing cattle, poisoning crops, or raping and killing civilians as charged by John Kerry, both in his book and in public statements. Since we both operated at the same time, in the same general area, and on the same missions under the same commanders, it is hard to believe his claims of atrocities and poor planning of Sea Lord missions. I signed this letter because I feel that he used Swift boat sailors to proclaim his antiwar statements after the war, and now he uses the same Swift boat sailors to support his claims of being a war hero. He cannot have it both ways, and we are here to ask for full disclosure of the proof of his claims." — James Steffes Kerry's swift boat supporters thought he'd be a great commander in chief even though he accused them all of committing numerous atrocities. Atrocities which everyone else say didn't happen. Comedy gold. You are serving a very useful purpose here, though, in that all your attaboys for dbp keep him engaged. I wouldn't want to say that he has a fragile psyche, but he did kind of disappear for awhile once Ricter stopped applauding him. Now that he has another cheerleader, he's back in the saddle.
I was hoping that Kerry would break a leg.... and look... Kerry breaks leg in bicycle crash; ends overseas trip early http://news.yahoo.com/secretary-kerry-flown-swiss-hospital-bike-crash-095653357--politics.html