The left excoriated Romney for being succesful in business and getting rich. They are ok however with Bill and Hill making $100 mill or so off speaking fees from the likes of public universities and investment banks. Or the various Clitnon foundations raking in hundreds of millions of unregulated money, often without attribution. It's kind of like how they cut Bill total slack for all the women he abused.
No, just the manner in which he got rich. He said he knew all about creating jobs, but apparently he spent more time ending them. He acquired good companies, indebted them, sucked out the cash and then broke them apart into pieces. Because he could. Legal? Sure. Repugnant? Absolutely. On the plus sided, I hear he created all kinds of lucrative jobs at Staples. I suppose that's...something.
Hillary must win to continue the good work on climate change that Obama has so smartly started. "God" forbid some science denying GOP moron...pick one....gets in office.
The Clinton Foundation took in hundreds of millions of dollars but only gave 8% to charity, spending most of the money as salaries and grants for friends of the Clinton's. Legal? Sure. Repugnant? Absolutely.
I think I'll wait for the dust to fully settle on this one before passing judgment. And when it does, and if you're right, then I will agree. But not until then. In the meantime, you know where I stand.
The purpose of a company is to supply products to consumers in the most efficient way possible. That seems to have escaped you. The notion that a large company is good and splitting it into smaller component companies is repugnant is just economic lunacy. I guess that's why liberals love big gov't. Because it's nothing but one big, worthless endeavor that hoards as much cash as it possibly can and creates make work jobs for people who aren't employable in any kind of real productive capacity.
fhl, please try not to embarrass yourself by dispensing bromides on subject matter about which you know nothing. You have yet to scratch the surface of a sound bite. Thanks for your time.
freddie, now that's the old thunderdog that we all know and didn't love. Tell me freddie, are you still doing those ballet exercizes? I think you referred to them as pistol squats.
Until you can do a single pistol squat slowly in proper form and for the full ATG range of motion, and without standing on an elevated surface, stfu. And then, if you ever get that far, which I doubt, until you can do the same for ten reps with added weight amounting to half your own bodyweight, again, stfu. And I am absolutely certain that you won't ever do the latter. Ever. Whereas I do it at every workout. Can you see the utter stupidity of ridiculing an exercise you can't even hope to ever do? Probably not.
Hey, I can't stand on my toes for lengthy periods of time either, like ballerinas do, but that doesn't necessarily make me less than fit, now does it? It just means I'm not a ballerina.