I will admit I have not racked up 4000+ posts like you...so I don't know if I am an expert. But, I think it is a matter of opinion. And again you attack me with your last sentence because my opinion differs from yours... Thanks for proving my point.
Huh? Here's some excerpts from your prior post. "What a bunch of babies" "What a bunch of sad, whining little people." "Life is too short, and you are filling most of yours with stupidity." You've possess some degree of nerve in accusing RM of attacking you.
...and my 'unprovoked' attacks on you came after <b><i>how many</b></i> instances of you aggressively drawing first blood, assaulting me with baseless accusations of unspeakable atrocities? <b>How many</b> times did you have to start that shit against me before I finally declared you to be fair game? What was it, like five times? Ten? More?
actually we were respectful towards each other till you posted the koran/toilet cartoon. immediately after that i lost all respect.
in recognition of the guest of honor (of this thread... ZZZzzzzz) <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LCayrqqDRVs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LCayrqqDRVs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
Baron: 1. How many complaints re Z have been received? 2. How many complaints are required to ban Z? 3. If we accept that some number of complaints are necessary to have Z banned, and if it is well-established that Z has previously been banned under previous aliases, then why would Z be permitted to continue posting under a new alias, since clearly Z has already exceeded the number of complaints necessary to ban his presence on ET? 4. Furthermore, if it is well-established that Z's alias is a cover for a person previously banned on multiple occasions, then what is the point of banning a poster, since that poster can apparently immediately reappear under a new alias?
You'll notice that Z10 has restrained himself from posting to this thread, even though I'm sure he's straining at the bit to tap out a "rebuttal." However, he avoids his folly knowing that it would be yet another convoluted display of "Z10 Logic."