whatever dood, u asked me about a call i gave that as an example, he trades this stock all yr round, and knows it inside out. i am not gonna spoon feed u, check the logs for the past months if u have the time or join the chat and see for uself...all am saying he knows his game and saying otherwise is just unfair.
am not promoting anything just saying how it is. u asked me all this stuff, go back and read your posts maybe u are missing something. i am done here, have a great xrsmas.
Excuse me, I didn't start by asking "all this stuff," rather it was you who were claiming his market knowledge; I simply asked you to point it out. You too, have a very Merry one!
that was a funny thread.. first time i have read it. i did not realise i was being summoned. rearden is correct about the poll and ZZZzzz is correct about the link not being a virus.
As near as I can tell, you guys start threads that invite debate on religion and politics. And when someone comes in and debates and argues, you cry like a baby and say they are "polluting" and should be banned. I read through some of Z's posts, and he seems to make some good points and debates that differ from what you think...so you want him banned? What a bunch of babies. Here are a few suggestions: 1.) Put him on ignore. 2.) Don't start threads that are going to cause controversy and spark debate if you cannot handle differing opinions. 3.) Get better at debating and presenting your pov...maybe then you would not feel like you have been "served". 4.) Don't threaten to pick up your toys and go home because people have a different opinion. It is a public forum, the topic is out there, anyone can contribute. GROW UP. What a bunch of sad, whining little people. You can dish it out, but you cannot take it. Life is too short, and you are filling most of yours with stupidity. Granted it is your choice, but still it is sad...
You can't read Z10 out of context and and understand his fallacy of argumentative "logic." Basically, the guy makes a premise and when proven wrong will shift his statement, change the subject, use ad hominem argument and other tactics. How else is it possible for Z10 to be never wrong?
Can you tell the difference between bona fide debate/argument, and the trolling tactics described in this thread? Should you decide to <b>pretend</b> not to understand said difference, I'll have to thank you for providing us with yet another helpful example of the 'Winning by Losing' trolling technique.
your posts in the thread you cited were worse than ZZZzzz's and you have attacked me unprovoked in the past, contrary to your claims.