We have grown up to assume a designer or programmer because things appear designed and/or programmed, but somehow that is not to be applied to the universe and everything in it simply because the designer and/or programmer has not presented himself/herself/itself to you? LOL!!! Utterly childish... There is no foundation logically to assume either design or non design, which blows out the theory that underlies most of modern day atheistic evolutionary theory of species from lower species by accident... When will you finally get real and admit there is not a case that can be proved that what looks designed or planned or programmed in nature is the consequence of randomness and unguided accidental change... Take away this one conjecture, unproved conjecture and what remains? Take away both design and non design and what do you have? You have fact...and fact alone. Remove the assumptions and what do you have? You have fact...and fact alone. Were you forced to stick with known facts, you would not have a case for your atheistic position...
Because you've grown up in a sea of man-made design you (mistakenly) assume that everything must have an intelligent design. including that which is not man-made. are you listening as a result, you (humans) have a severe cognitive bias toward "things made of parts". But EVERYTHING is made of parts. just because some parts came together with some other parts doesn't PROVE that man made them OR more importantly that the "ultimate collection of parts" (AKA God) put them together. Parts come in contact with others randomly, that come in contact with other parts and so on... ad infinitum or at least to beginning of the universe so, to sum things up.. the universe don't need no stinkin' god
"so, to sum things up.. the universe don't need no stinkin' god" That sums up your belief system... However, the belief you have is fundamentally no different in nature than one who believes the exact opposite... ...as you have nothing but lack of your own predefined bias that grasps as your own conclusion. Nothing scientific at all, just your own bias...
if i have any bias at all it is for PROOF. Evidence. making the RATIONAL case. that is MY bias. âIf it is a Miracle, any sort of evidence will answer, but if it is a Fact, proof is necessaryâ -mark twain
If your bias is for proof, then give proof of unguided unplanned un-programmed parts magically assembling themselves out of nothing, or life doing the same from non life... To assume the position you have which is not based on fact or proof is not rational, it is biased...
if as YOU put it that "unguided unplanned un-programmed parts magically assembling themselves out of nothing" is impossible, then what does this say of God's origin?
was you afraid of 777 you'd sell out your rational mind change of venue is in your recent future get used to it
You don't have a cogent intelligent answer to my question so what do you do? Act like the fool you are... Time for you to cry for stu..."Help me stu, help me..."
'And in the College of Medicine, Martin Cohn studies how fish developed fins to better understand a common birth defect. These and other UF scientists share a commitment to the revolution Darwinâs treatise on evolution sparked. âEvolution is the fundamental thing that ties all of biology together and makes it a science,â says Smith. Reed echoes the words of Mayrâs contemporary, the renowned evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky, when he says, ânothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution.â http://www.research.ufl.edu/publications/explore/current/story_1/index.html