Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong

i'm afraid of being foolish and irrational

 

IMHO: Only arrogant fools believe this, but hey don't feel bad you have lots of company.

 

Lack of supporting evidence requiring a creator. Lack of evidence supporting the existence of a creator. But, then, judging by your political posts, lack of supporting evidence never seems to hinder your conviction and resolve, does it?

 

Let us not forget the words of Epicurus:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

So even if a god did actually exist, how would the theist god groupies respond?

 

ROFL!!!

some people live as complete fools their entire lives...amazinG!

 

Nice try but that only leads to the opinion of "I don't know" not personal investment in trying to convince others a creator does not exist.

If you are honest your answers are:
1)I have evidence that proves to me God exists, therefore I believe.
2) I believe
3) I don't believe
4) I don't know
*5) I know because I'm God incarnate.
( rare but history appears to verify people really get upset over this one)

 

if you are speaking of stu i believe most of his effort here has been expended in showing people like YOU that god cannot exist based on YOUR evidence and argument.

YOUR evidence is non-existent and your arguments have been specious, so far.

 

The same can be said about unicorns, Russell's celestial teapot, spaghetti monsters, etc. Pick any myth that allows itself to be interpreted in any numbers of ways that the believer chooses, and then try to deny its existence. Round and round we go. Just so that you understand we are talking about a man-made myth along with the others I mentioned here, in that they all have more similarities than differences. How about that Zeus, eh?

 

1) Able, but since God exists outside of time & space it apparently does not suit your demands.

2) Omnipotent but limits himself to allow you free choice.

3) Perhaps, but that's your opinion, since your observations are severely limited in perspective.

4) Consequential misuse of your freedom of choice.

 

examine for the moment his first choice:

1)I have evidence that proves to me God exists, therefore I believe.

funny that when he presents this "evidence that proves to me" it isn't evidence at all, not in the true sense that would convince any rational being.