Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jficquette, Mar 27, 2010.

  1. of course it is, EVERYONE thinks they are lone soul privy to the TRUTH :D
     
    #101     Mar 31, 2010
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    Uhh, no.

    The fact the term "worldview" existed before I came along confirms I'm not the "lone soul", not to mention that it also indicates that there are more than one (worldviews, aka paradigms).
     
    #102     Mar 31, 2010
  3. Bunch of noise making here evolution and God are not mutually exclusive so both extremes have a tendency to look the fool.


    As usual it's the evolutionist's here that have a tendency to support the most extreme stance.




    The theory of evolution will persist or more likely morph until something better comes along.
     
    #103     Mar 31, 2010
  4. there are billions and YOU have the true one (but you can't prove it)

    and that's YOUR problem isn't it LOL :D
     
    #104     Mar 31, 2010
  5. enlighten us about the evolution of god, if you will :D
     
    #105     Mar 31, 2010

  6. You wouldn't understand even if I told you using the most rudimentary of concepts.


    One aspect you might grasp would be God appears to evolve as man's capacity to understand the creator grows.
     
    #106     Mar 31, 2010
  7. wow that's really deep :D (sh^t)
     
    #107     Mar 31, 2010
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    I agree there could be billions, in theory, but of course there would be a tremendous overlap of concepts. Few would be as fully developed as science and religion.

    I have never said, nor do I think I've ever implied, that I think my world view is the "true" one. No, I believe it is but one of many, though as largely a product of the West it is readily recognizable.
     
    #108     Mar 31, 2010
  9. You say your world "overview is greater" than science and reason can provide. how is your worldview more reliable? you imply something MORE than science or reason can offer..what is that smthg SPECIAL you and you alone are privy to? :D
     
    #109     Mar 31, 2010
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    I meant "greater" quantitatively, sorry.
     
    #110     Mar 31, 2010