Why Doesnt The US INVADE NKOREA!!! JuST LIKE IRAQ???

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mahram, Jul 8, 2006.

  1. Ummmm didnt iraq already cause 150 thousand iraqi deaths already?

    The reason im asking about us taking out north korea b/c president bush has made it clear as part of his doctrine to attack first and ask questions later. A premptive doctrine. Why did you invade iraq?

    Hheheh and canada is not stupid enought to call out your enemies. Without building up an army strong enought to fight them :D

     
    #11     Jul 8, 2006
  2. ===================
    Actually agree with that;
    Dr.Pat Robertson's CBN news called them a Stalinist Disneyland, Stalin appointed the current leaders Dad.

    Since they are axis of evil, like Ronald Reagan called commies in Nicaragua,Afghanistan... ''Evil empire'', they fell also;
    North Korea could fall like a rotten fruit, gravity rules against them

    Russian commies admitted they were afraid of Reagans star wars;
    may not even need it against North Korea, missle was a ''dud''


    :cool:
     
    #12     Jul 8, 2006
  3. So tell me Mahram, why are you so bitter towards the US in general? Are you Persian? Do you feel betrayed because we let the mongrels overrun your country? Or do you seriously identify more with Canada and simply have penis envy? Canada is an amalgamation of two defunct empires that more than had their share of "mistakes" on the international stage. Iran/Persia is a defunct empire that surely had its mistakes and outrages. Tell truth what you really want more than anything is to be an American, to be able to feel some real nationalistic pride. Instead you are doomed to be nothing but an envious onlooker. That is a shame. You really should not allow your envy to be so evident. It really is pitiful.
     
    #13     Jul 8, 2006
  4. Quoting Pat Robertson?

    LOL...

     
    #14     Jul 8, 2006
  5. The US doesn't have the resources or the will of the people to attack NK right now, unless it would be with a devastating nuclear first strike. That would be a horrible event with all sorts of dangerous repercussions, including vast amounts of fallout on neighboring countries. Better I think to let them die of their own accord in abject poverty and through carefully orchestrated sanctions. Communism can't survive in the modern world. Just ask the USSR. Let it fail on its own and hope they don't sell their nukes to terrorists. If they do, then nuke 'em 'til they glow.
     
    #15     Jul 8, 2006
  6. The dear leader cant live forever- I wonder who's lining up for that job, it'd be a bloodbath.
     
    #16     Jul 9, 2006
  7. thats what they said about fidel, and hes still here.

     
    #17     Jul 9, 2006
  8. Cesko

    Cesko

    Yes and he really matters.
     
    #18     Jul 9, 2006
  9. except if fidel had nukes and icbms. :D If russians got those nukes over there, the world would have been a nuclear pit right now :D

     
    #19     Jul 9, 2006
  10. there is a real easy answer: n-korea has so many regular warfare items pointed on seoul, the city would be cleared in 30 minutes.
     
    #20     Jul 9, 2006