Why does TA not work (for you)?

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Xspurt, Aug 4, 2012.

  1. Fah Q

    Fah Q

    thank you, no i will not attend.
     
    #861     Aug 11, 2012
  2. Rock n roll hootchie koo. Do TA traders believe they can make winning trades from z randomly generated chart like the ones posted earlier? If so, why and if not, why not? Therein Lays the logical fallacy of your entire premise.

    Surf
     
    #862     Aug 11, 2012
  3. BSAM

    BSAM

    Brother Surf...

    Do you consider yourself:

    A. A trader

    B. An author

    C. Both
     
    #863     Aug 11, 2012
  4. Does your price drivers system work with the same consistency if you use only one piece and disregard the other components that have you "believing" in its success?


     
    #864     Aug 11, 2012
  5. the1

    the1

    I hope you don't mind my chiming in briefly but, no. One piece of data - if that's what you meant - is of no use. Whether your method of analysis is fundamental, statistical, economic, and so on, all we're doing is analysis a time series, which requires an almost infinite amount of data. Pick your starting point.....

     
    #865     Aug 11, 2012
  6. I'm a trader who likes to write about my experiences. Surf
     
    #866     Aug 11, 2012
  7. Exactly, thanks for the cogent response. Surf. :)
     
    #867     Aug 11, 2012
  8. Exactly, which was my point. If you trade successfully using TA, most likely a chart alone will not suffice.

     
    #868     Aug 11, 2012
  9. If TA analysts don't think the market is random, why would the ability to make winning trades on a randomly generated data series matter?

    The TA analyst would obviously say "The fact that you can't make consistently winning trades on random data means nothing because the market is not random".

    It's interesting the things you think are convincing arguments.
     
    #869     Aug 11, 2012
  10. What field have you had more financial success in?

     
    #870     Aug 11, 2012