Why does TA not work (for you)?

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Xspurt, Aug 4, 2012.

  1. LOL, right over surf's head!!

     
    #1301     Aug 15, 2012
  2. traderchi128

    traderchi128 Guest


    Nah....I bet you he understood.
     
    #1302     Aug 15, 2012
  3. Yeah, only it isn't. I'm not going to lay out the equation for you, but there is one. In fact, there are two equations, one for long trades and one for short trades.
     
    #1303     Aug 15, 2012
  4. You must not know what the word "illustrate" means :p

     
    #1304     Aug 15, 2012
  5. this thread is complete noise.. i'm unsubscribing.. you guys are all wasting eachothers time..!
     
    #1305     Aug 15, 2012
  6. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    HurricaneUS wanted you know "before hand" that cornixforex was going to make a commentary that flags in strong trends are probably the best breakouts so that you'll have enough time to post a real-time chart or real-time commentary as the CL futures breakout was occurring.

    For example, I like volatility breakouts.

    Therefore, to make HurricaneUS happy...you should know that I was going to say I like volatility breakouts "before I said it" so that you can respond in real-time with a real-time chart or real-time price action commentary of one occurring.

    To do such, I recommend you subscribe to this thread so that you can get real-time email updates that someone has posted a message in this thread...preferably you get the updates "before" the commentary actually happens so that your replies with charts are not hindsight. :D

    I now strongly agree. The fat lady is singing and everybody's point has been made a dozen times over. I'm outta here.
     
    #1306     Aug 15, 2012
  7. baro-san

    baro-san

    I don't think you can argue that the best exit is not the best entry in the opposite direction (Jack Hershey's SCT). The market doesn't care of anybody's "individual goals, capital and risk tolerance". If you're just guessing, there's no winning combination of "individual goals, capital and risk tolerance".
     
    #1307     Aug 15, 2012
  8. I'm sorry I wasn't on today.

    Shoot me a blank log.

    I can use it to help you get logging down. in all ways.

    I'll come back in couple of hours.
     
    #1308     Aug 15, 2012
  9. expecting way better than this surf, you were busting on someone for talking about market wizards, then you drop a musty obscure article
    from 1991, I am glad I was not on your debate team....:p
     
    #1309     Aug 15, 2012
  10. Not only that, but the article states on the first page that the authors take it as proven that under certain assumptions, past price information can be used to make abnormal profits (their phrase), which goes against surf's claim that past prices are useless.

    "There are few sophisticated technical rules that may explain why technical analysis works. For example, Treynor and Ferguson (JF, 2985) demonstrate the usefulness of past price information in making an abnormal profit. They develop a Bayesian probability estimate using past price data to assess whether the market incorporates some firm-specific information, that is made available to investors. If the market does not have such information, and this is confirmed in past price data, the investor with this private information can make a trading profit. Technical analysis in the Treynor-Ferguson sense is beyond the scope of this paper, however."
     
    #1310     Aug 15, 2012