Why does TA not work (for you)?

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Xspurt, Aug 4, 2012.

  1. I don't manage other people's money.

    surf
     
    #1281     Aug 15, 2012

  2. Yes, 1/ 2 is objective, 1/2 is subjective. surf
     
    #1282     Aug 15, 2012
  3. Fah Q

    Fah Q

    so not programmable. you said earlier you are only interested in something that can be programmed?

    :confused:
     
    #1283     Aug 15, 2012
  4. Fah Q

    Fah Q

    looks like garbage
     
    #1284     Aug 15, 2012
  5. Yes, from outside the group, only interested in objective, programmable methods with edge. Our internal work is just that---
     
    #1285     Aug 15, 2012
  6. Fah Q

    Fah Q

    so price drivers is a subjective method. hmm very interesting.
     
    #1286     Aug 15, 2012
  7. Look, people don't go around talking about "my contribution to trading" if they don't want to manage OPM at some point. So, you aren't doing so now, doesn't mean you aren't angling to in the future.

    And, so you can get a sense of what it's like sitting on the other side of this discussion with you, if you deny that you want to, I'll claim I don't believe you.
     
    #1287     Aug 15, 2012
  8. Jah, the exits are subjective.

    surf
     
    #1288     Aug 15, 2012
  9. Yeah, the nickname for "price drivers" should be "cotton candy", since it seems about as substantive.
     
    #1289     Aug 15, 2012
  10. Nah, I love the markets and trading. So. I do my best to improve things and help fellow traders advance.

    We invest in working, proven edges that are far greater than we could ever develop in house. Not to mention not having the infrastructure and redundancy to interest those with the capital to invest. Direct management of OPM has no interest for me---indirect--its what i do. surf surf
     
    #1290     Aug 15, 2012