Why does Marketsurfer get special treatment by Magna?

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Clubber Lang, Jun 18, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Please come clean and just admit MS is a paid employee to drum up posts and page views.

    If not, I see no reason why MS can continually harass others to post screenshots but the same cannot be asked of him.

    Thank you.
  2. Something is clearly fishy when it comes to Surf. He gets special treatment left and right here, no doubt about it.
  3. Lucrum


    True, maybe Magna feels guilty for having banned smurf so many times in the past.
  4. Surf brings in the page views. I don' t know how he does it, but look at any thread he has started.

  5. He does it because he is a good showman. A terrible trader, but a good showman :)

  6. BSAM


    Here's the thing.
    Brother Surf is sometimes good for a laugh.
    If you take what he posts seriously, then the laugh is on you.
    IMO, I rarely see him post anything of value.
    He sure does make a lot of you upset.
  7. BSAM


    He knows how to play to your emotions.
  8. You mistake active engagement with being upset. I can assure you, I'm not upset but I do enjoy engaging in banter. I'm not perfect :D

  9. MattSF


    Traffic swells when viewing an accident. That's the metaphor you're looking for. Surf's threads are no better than average in page views x posts or by age. There are literally dozens of journals that get more views.

    I offered to bet Surf about the legitimacy of the YM trade, but he complained and it was quickly deleted. How can Surf ride a winner to a loser? It's not a loser when the trade didn't exist. Magna states that it doesn't matter as he called it beforehand, but I think it matters as Surf called out Cornix for proof that his fills existed.

    Ask yourself why he gets any page views at all ---------------->

  10. Magna has deleted many of my post when it had to do with surfer. Seems he is the protective older brother.
    #10     Jun 18, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.