I don't get it? Do people want to see more wealth and more jobs get shipped overseas? You realize it take two incomes for most families to live in a neighborhood with good schools on the coasts. That same thing was done with 1 income when I was a kid. today 30 years old are making the same amount of money their parents did. yes world competition is one thing... but really dumb trade policy, 700 percent systemic inflation and massive taxation are also big factors. Why would any american with a brain cheer for more of that? I really don't understand it?
fills cabinet positions like the mob. loyalty, nepotism, connections. competency & qualification mean nothing.
I know nothing about the picks but it seemed to me it was generals, top businessmen and some people who helped his campaign win. Besides after what Clinton and Kerry did to the middle East and Iran anyone is likely to be an improvement... I think the fewer politicians the better.
Good luck with that. The report is already rumored to have a glaring lack of details and the sole premise of Russian involvement is a purported custody chain of information with no proof. Even if any part of it is true, it will merely show that the Russians purchased using cyber-currency stolen emails from hacked servers in the underground market - emails that were being offered to any party who wanted to purchase them. On the Russian receiving side, I expect there were several related private parties in the purchasing chain to provide clear distance between the government and the purchase. Funnily enough, any details that are offered will probably merely prove that the Russian government had nothing to do with hacking the server(s) but merely is one of many parties who purchased the information. Something I expect the U.S. government does all the time when gathering information on foreign leaders.
To paraphrase Obama: We Won , STFU. I didn't vote for Trump, I voted to "make America Great Again". The canidate could have been anybody, he just happened to run. We no longer have to hope, change is here.
the administration and its cronies have lost all trust with with lies over the years. Gruber proves that. Assange has gained trust over the years and has never lied to us. Retired law enforcement deem him a credible source. No one would deem Obama that. Obama is deemed a politician by friends and a proven liar by most. if you asked most whether assange is telling the truth or Obama and Clapper. I would bet assange is telling the truth, russia did not give him the emails. To be clear I would be very surprised if assange was lying. So that means Obama the DNC and Clapper are shady.
Actually I believe other sources over "Intelligence Officials" appointed by a Democratic administration who make assertions but provide no real proof. I will admit this is a long term problem with the intelligence community in the U.S.; when the leaders are appointees then the agencies tend to offer up data that only supports the administrations political point of view while twisting data to "prove" their agenda. This is just as true with the Bush Iraq chemical weapons evidence as it is with the current "Russians hacked our servers" nonsense.