Why Do We Trade? For Real.

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by cornix, Mar 10, 2015.


  1. Peace-- statistics are statistics-- there is no such thing as personalized testing-- this is what separates truth from fanciful thinking. It's easy to be fooled by randomness--- many smart people have been .... surf
     
    #161     Mar 12, 2015

  2. Nostradamus? How many times previous have you been wrong?
     
    #162     Mar 12, 2015
  3. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    It would help if "TA" were defined, but, yes, pretty much.
     
    #163     Mar 12, 2015
    lucysparabola likes this.
  4. no Surf, no wars here. But if you say statistics are statistics, then would not their results be the same if documented by a few vs documented by thousands?
     
    #164     Mar 12, 2015
  5. See, that's the disconnect. TA is so broad. I don't even know if my stuff would qualify as TA... but I know that it wins in the long run and that's why I trade.

    (hooray for relevant response to the OP!)
     
    #165     Mar 12, 2015
  6. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    No, I just know how to draw a trend channel. Anyone can do it. If they can draw a straight line.
     
    #166     Mar 12, 2015
  7. Yes, but the problem it really isn't documented by a few. If these folks are tellign the truth, its like a lottery winner saying he choose his numbers by some formula and if you use it you will win also. it makes no sense. surf
     
    #167     Mar 12, 2015
  8. cornix

    cornix

    Absolutely agree. However, we must work with whatever we have in reality. :)
     
    #168     Mar 12, 2015
  9. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Actually, it's not so broad. It began with the study of price behavior then diverted into patterns and indicators. But patterns and indicators are both intended to "work" due to changes in price behavior.
     
    #169     Mar 12, 2015
    marketsurfer likes this.
  10. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    You're the OP. It's up to you.
     
    #170     Mar 12, 2015
    marketsurfer likes this.