Why do traders fail?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by Tradester123, Sep 10, 2013.

  1. cornix

    cornix

    GC :)

    Appreciate the help. :)
     
    #221     Mar 31, 2014
  2. GC 10 ticks for the year is probably easy.

    Now GC 3 ticks in a year : probably easy, easy, super easy , or any "idiot" ( in a good way) could do it after a bit of trading experience?
     
    #222     Mar 31, 2014
  3. cornix

    cornix

    Ironically it doesn't seem like there's a big difference between 3 and 10... 100 as well. either you have a skill for that or you don't. In the second case chances are you lose. Total amount is of less importance.

    Consistent profits or consistent losses are two the most important concepts.
     
    #223     Mar 31, 2014
  4. OK you are showing psychological resistance.

    GC 3 ticks in a year : probably easy ? easy? super easy? any "idiot" ( in a good way) could do it after some experience? which one.
     
    #224     Mar 31, 2014
  5. If break even is good for 1 year of trading, then 10 ticks above that is easy?
     
    #225     Mar 31, 2014
  6. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    I can't think of a better illustration of why traders fail than this exchange.
     
    #226     Mar 31, 2014
  7. cornix

    cornix

    No resistance. Just think 3 and 10 are about within the boundaries of randomness.
     
    #227     Mar 31, 2014
  8. dbphoenix : open mindedness please. :)
     
    #228     Mar 31, 2014
  9. GC 3 ticks in a year : probably easy ? easy? super easy? any "idiot" ( in a good way) could do it after some experience? which one.
     
    #229     Mar 31, 2014
  10. cornix

    cornix

    I wasn't referring to myself saying break-even is good. It would certainly be good for myself 9 years ago though...
     
    #230     Mar 31, 2014