Why do people use Volume, Range and Tic charts?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by fearless9, Nov 13, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The only sales pitch in this thread is you selling people on the potential of you having an IQ greater than 80.

    You have "ZERO" clue what I do so you have "ZERO" credibility to make comments on it.
     
    #971     Nov 12, 2007
  2. You are a clueless individual that knows absolutely nothing about what we are discussing here and the more you type the less credibility you retain.

    PERIOD!
     
    #972     Nov 12, 2007
  3. Razor,

    Here is the 343 with the auto-labeling.
    The Trend of this particular chart is a Bear, so the move up here is counter trend but confirming.
     
    #973     Nov 12, 2007
  4. Razor

    Razor

    Cheers ! :D

    Will study it and get back to you on my thoughts :D



     
    #974     Nov 12, 2007
  5. Razor

    Razor

    Hi Prof,

    Man, I must be very slow as I just can't get my head around how to decipher Primary Bull and Primary Bear trends and how they change. I thought all you needed was a HH, HL, HH on the chart you are watching / trading along with your oscillator hitting above the cut off line on the HH, below the cutoff line on the HL and then back above again on the HH and then you are in Primary Bull ?

    Cheers :D
     
    #975     Nov 12, 2007
  6. Based on my so far crude understanding of this method, you guys must be making a killing in trending markets. How do perform in ranging, choppy markets ?

    Mars
     
    #976     Nov 12, 2007
  7. WD40

    WD40

    I am being generous today.
    If you want to learn more, do a search of Prologic on ET. There are a few threads with firework and thunder. But if you can cut through the smoke, you will find all the detail you need.
     
    #977     Nov 12, 2007


  8. :D

    it's perfectly clear in the past, just look at the pretty charts.....
     
    #978     Nov 12, 2007
  9. ZenEng

    ZenEng

    More like Abbott and Costello "Whos on first? No, who's on second..."

    Seriously, I don't know why we can't all completely ignore surf's posts, entirely.

    Every reply, even the most trivial, encourages more noise on this thread.
     
    #979     Nov 12, 2007
  10. Surf:

    I dont know what your problem is. Why are you on Plogic's tail? If you have problems with him/her just say so. You are becoming very annoying!

    FYI: CVB is a means of measuring "market time". "Market Time", inherently, is fractal in nature. This is not the chronological time most of us are used to. Unless you understand this (which, based on your posts, doesn't seem like you do), you will not get what plogic is trying to communicate.

    If you really want to understand what plogic is saying think about the following:
    - What does constant time charts measure?
    - What does constant volume charts measure? (constant volume charts are NOT the same as constant tick charts).
    - What use are these measurements to a trader? (Hint: Market understanding, trading tactics, etc).

    Once you understand the answers to these questions, go re-read plogic's comments on CVB charts dampening [chronological] time based price oscillations.

    Hope this helps.

    -MadSpeculator.

    PS: I am not interested in your negative comments!!!
     
    #980     Nov 12, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.