Why do people use Volume, Range and Tic charts?

they are not labeled in real time, they are labeled in the past. do you know how illogical it sounds to label a chart in real time? the chart itself is the past. you are simply describing what has happened, nothing more.

surf

 

Yes, it is programmable. If you would bother to take the time to learn what I actually do you would already know that.

 

The chart is labeled immediately as the bar is BEING created. Again, you would know this if you bothered to educate yourself on what I do, not what you THINK I do.

 

send me the program, i'll have it analysed and tested then report the findings objectively.

here's your chance.

surf

 

Let me see if i follow you, you are labeling a slower bar as its being created based on faster bars? otherwise, you must be kreskin or at the least geller.

surf

 

for anyone who is using this, whats the purpose of the longer volume chart and what is the purpose of the shorter volume chart. I'm totally lost on this method. How do you set the ergodic to the settings of the faster time chart?

 

Here's my chance for what, having "Andy Gump" tattooed on my forehead.

The program, has taken me 5 years to develop and more money then you made last year and I'm going to send it to you. Now I know you are certifiable or on drugs or both.

The only thing you have ever done objectively is wipe when necessary and I'm now beginning to think that was pretty subjective.

You had your chance to review what I do first hand and blew it.

 

You couldn't follow your nose in a dark room.
The labeling program which you see on all of my posted charts, which is the foundation of the programmable version, is being used by over a hundred people successfully. Try prying it out of one of their hands . . . LOL

You are too funny. Maybe when all of your money runs out you can get a job writing for SNL.

 

Read "Dow Theory" and maybe it will make some sense.
I thought you had to work?

 

i guess this is a refusal to having your work tested, i am not surprised. the foul lanquage is also par for the course

your quite the psychic. you know how much money i made last year and are able to label charts prior to their bars finishing.

then you use the classic illusionist's tactic of insisting that people see it with their own eyes instead of using objective testing.

seriously, professor ( and i use that term losely ) you are in the wrong league here. perhaps, you should go back to the kitchen.

surf