Why do people use Volume, Range and Tic charts?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by fearless9, Nov 13, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. It seems he's been playing that 1-to-2 pts of profit YM trade hustle for years now.
    ***
    hank rollins


    Registered: Jan 2005
    Posts: 905


    04-04-05 01:26 PM



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Quote from ProfLogic:

    I POSTED THE REVERSAL THIS MORNING @ 9:39 SHORT @ 1176.00. THAT IS A PROFIT OF 2+ POINTS.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    LOL ! you closed the trade on friday at the close AND you closed it on monday morning ? ya cant have it both ways , prof !

    BUSTED !






    ps. regarding the math comment, you entered @ 1174.75 and closed at 1176---- 2 plus points ?? LOL !!!!!
    ***
    No wonder Marketsurfer can't stand him, he's full of crap, and he definitely hasn't changed his stripes.
     
    #1211     Mar 5, 2008
  2. I have atttended Prof's class. The statements about what Prof does and teaches contained in this PM are simply not correct. Nor are the statements about what he claims to have done. The PM loosely uses some of the same words Prof uses, and manages to mangle the truth significantly by rearranging the words more than a tad. This is a not uncommon ploy to attack someone with no basis. Paying attention to a PM from some unknown source is like paying attention to broker reccomendations from ET posters, you are better off with a flip of a coin. How does one know the whole PM isn't ficticious? You don't.

    I do not intend to say anything else about Prof or what he teaches, that's not my place; so don't bother trying to extract anything from me. I will say my best advice: make up your own mind about Prof (or anyone else for that matter)based on your own experiences with the individual. Listening to others (particularly on the internet) will only serve to muddy your own thought process.
     
    #1212     Mar 5, 2008
  3. #1213     Mar 5, 2008
  4. Wow, the sheep are really coming out of the barn over this one.

    If I was Baron I'd toss his ass of the webiste ASAP or make him pay a vendor fee for selling his courses through his contacts at Elite Trader (this post falls under numbers 2, 3 and 5 of my list).

    LOL, you fools are just too easy. :p
     
    #1214     Mar 5, 2008
  5. Yes.

    By all means lets get back to the free advertising for your trading vendor business. :p

    Your so-called students are kind of moronic, aren't they?

    I accuse you of being a vendor and they come on here and talk about their experiences taking your courses... is that how you paid for your mansion? LOL ... or was it with your 1pt and 2pts YM trades? :D
     
    #1215     Mar 5, 2008
  6. You could keep the thread on track by not replying to off topic posts. You may have to have a mod clean up the thread a couple of times, but, with no attention paid to them, those posters probably would soon wander off to more exciting threads.

    Well, that's my theory anyway.
     
    #1216     Mar 5, 2008
  7. I agree.
    I think they are in the process of doing that now. Baron emailed me once and I'm waiting on an answer to another now.
     
    #1217     Mar 5, 2008
  8. think, people, think.

    There is NO edge here, NONE!

    No doubt these guys may truly believe what they teach, but it's all based on perceptional biases and faulty understanding of how markets really work. may i suggest "equity markets in action" as a good start for a solid foundation for starting a real education.

    Dubious claims from anyone trying to sell you anything must be deeply discounted.

    there are REAL edges, but not here.

    regards,

    surf
     
    #1218     Mar 5, 2008
  9. Yum, sounds like a new sucker just waiting for you PompousLogic (be sure to send him a PM inviting him to be part of your entourage!) ... LOL
     
    #1219     Mar 5, 2008
  10. LOL, I hope you're holding your breath.
     
    #1220     Mar 5, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.