Why did Europe open the door so much for Islamics?

Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by noob_trad3r, Mar 22, 2012.

  1. And I'll bet the wisest among them knew how insufficient they were.
     
    #51     Mar 22, 2012
  2. Sorry jem but tariffs are a terrible way to fund gubbermint. A very small consumption tax is much better in my opinion.
     
    #52     Mar 22, 2012
  3. When you have an idea more substantial than my spelling or grammar let me know.

    I like the laughs.:D
     
    #53     Mar 22, 2012
  4. They've learned their lesson because "multiculturalism" (bending over backwards for Muslims) has failed spectacularly:

    In the UK:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12371994
    In France:
    http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/February/Frances-Sarkozy-Multiculturalism-Has-Failed/
    In Germany:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed
    In the Netherlands:
    http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2219/netherlands-abandons-multiculturalism
     
    #54     Mar 22, 2012
  5. achilles28

    achilles28

    I guess there's no debt crisis in Europe, after all? A fiction invented by journalists to sell more newspapers, maybe? Germany is fine. The UK, France, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Greece, are not fine. I'm surprised you can't connected the dots between unsustainable debt and "Reasonable" social spending and trade policy. Where does one get the money to pay for the gigantic bureaucracies and lavish social programs, if not from the economy? My entire point, and maybe I should retract my comment on your fluency :D, is this "middle ground" approach, is a moving target, which always shifts towards unsustainable economics (short-term gain, for long-term pain). The "Extreme" approach, the hardliner approach of strict fiscal conservationism and relatively protectionist trade policies, is far superior and would have avoided this entire debt crisis to begin with. There is no middle ground there. No comprise, Martin. Black or white. Right or wrong. Yes or no. Up or down. North or south. Don't waffle on the issue :D
     
    #55     Mar 23, 2012
  6. You're being utterly silly if you imagine that the founding fathers were these unyielding stubborn fools who existed in the world of high-faluting principles and rigid moral standards. I mean didn't you quote Alexander Hamilton earlier? What about the bitter disagreements between Hamilton, on one side, and Jefferson and Madison, on the other? What about the compromise they eventually reached? Does that sound like a bunch of ideologues to you?
     
    #56     Mar 23, 2012

  7. Well, in order to preserve whatever is left of your good opinion of me, let's just agree to disagree on this, shall we?
     
    #57     Mar 23, 2012
  8. I am aware of all of this, thanks... I am being intentionally provocative.
     
    #58     Mar 23, 2012
  9. achilles28

    achilles28

    I don't agree to that :D
     
    #59     Mar 23, 2012