Why creation science is an oxymoron

Discussion in 'Politics' started by kut2k2, Feb 4, 2010.

  1. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    Because unlike you, I know what reality is.
     
    #251     Feb 14, 2010
  2. Ahhh, another so called master of reality...

    Thanks for making my point for me...


     
    #252     Feb 14, 2010
  3. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    You have a point?
     
    #253     Feb 14, 2010
  4. Yes, the point is that you don't even know you are not dreaming at this moment...

    You can't even see the back of your own head with your own eyes...

    You can't even catch a fly with your bare hands...

    Yet you know what reality is?

    Too funny...

     
    #254     Feb 14, 2010
  5. So what are the means that he can be measured, if at all?

    My point being that your concept of God is a purely theoretical exercise on a personal level and is not a reflection on someone else if he denies it without any validation. They can believe in the 'nothingness' concept prevalent in eastern scriptures of Buddhism or Hinduism and still have a valid path to further enquiry without a borrowed concept of someone else's personal god form.
     
    #255     Feb 15, 2010
  6. By what means can you measure the love of a mother for a child?

    Their actions?

    LOL!!!

    Since the motive for actions is unknowable by the actions alone...

    ...well, try harder to come up with something that is not so easy to refute.

     
    #256     Feb 15, 2010
  7. When you say 'love' between mother and child, there is the thing called love which is a human emotion/state of mind/behavioral/genetic etc which I am not denying exists.

    Now in cae of god, what exactly am I denying here? Thats all I want to know.
     
    #257     Feb 15, 2010
  8. So you believe the love between a mother and child is simply a human emotion/state of mind/behavioral/genetic etc.

    Sounds like you had a great childhood...

    This still being Valentine's Day on the West Coast...does your boyfriend/girlfriend/mother/father know you views on love?

    LOL!!!

    In any case, the love that you say exists cannot be measured by scientific instrumentation...

     
    #258     Feb 15, 2010
  9. You just want to make this into a semantics fest. I am asking what exactly is an atheist denying and you introduce a double bind like this was a political debate.
     
    #259     Feb 15, 2010
  10. It is not a semantics issue at all.

    It is impossible to know someone's motive, yet it exists. Love is an inner quality, not something that is known with the senses.

    Actions can be measured, but not someone's intent. Every day on TV or the movies we see actor pretending to feel, to be in love with someone else, etc...when it is just an act, i.e. not genuine.

    Plenty of things exist in our lives that cannot be measured or known to be true with scientific instrumentation...

     
    #260     Feb 15, 2010