I'm not failing to grasp anything moron. I know what belief is and I have a general idea what you consider evidence. Problem is I accept evidence that you summarily dismiss that's why it's a "belief" on both sides of the equation. Unfortunately for you , you seem to be under the impression that everything that you believe or accept as true has been subjected to the rigors of evidence which you demand here and that there is only 1 universally accepted answer. That my friend is patently false, thirty years ago scientists were convinced we were in a new ice age and stomach ulcers were caused by stress. Today it's global warming and known bacteria Please explain the rigorous scientific proof that liberalism, and Keynesian economics is correct or any other philosophy on life issues?
your "rules of evidence" obviously is at odds with modern conception and more in keeping with Dark Age ideation. please enlighten us with your new found rules
I was referring to my evidence for belief not proof to non-believers. I hold many beliefs that are not provable in a laboratory without chance of error. I admit this unlike you and you disingenuous colleagues. Besides science is wisely specifically mum about making a conclusion as to the existence of "God". keep twisting in the wind,my friend you are amusing. Good Day
1) I'm not angry. I think he's an asshole. I'm pretty much coming to the same conclusion about you. 2) Yes, what would jesus say to kts?
do you hold the medically confirmed schizo's belief equal in measure and truth to your own? should WE the rest of humanity simply accept any proposition equal to another? yours, the schizo's or anyones' or should we apply some measure forged in human experience and reason? or maybe your truth is divinely inspired and therefore requires special consideration?