Why creation science is an oxymoron

Discussion in 'Politics' started by kut2k2, Feb 4, 2010.

  1. Who is actually shoving God (yes, God...not god, like in "In God We Trust") in your face?

    Who is demanding you go to Heaven? I doubt you will not find any theists here who actually cares if you burn in eternal Hell or not...

    You reaction below seems...well...it seem very reactive without cause...

    Could you be projecting anger and resentment from your past onto the present time?


     
    #131     Feb 11, 2010
  2. Kindly point out when I've done either to you.
     
    #132     Feb 11, 2010
  3. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    You're talking nonsense again, as you always do sooner or later on this topic. "God" is a word. The dictionary can't give a straightforward, logical definition of words? Then it's not really a dictionary. I've already defined atheism. If you aren't paying attention, whose fault is that? (hint: not mine.)

    By the way, I bet YOU can't give a logical and straightforward definition of god. Not God ... god. Just because you're a monotheist, that's no excuse for not thinking outside your little box. Or is it? :D :D
     
    #133     Feb 11, 2010
  4. Define nonsense without a reference to sense...

    God is a name, not just a word. God is understood in every language by a different word, but God remains God.

    god is a being that is not God, typically a being with limited power or limited scope. There is only one God, there are many gods.

     
    #134     Feb 11, 2010
  5. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    How about you and the other anti-evolutionists demanding that creationism be taught in science classes? You keep acting like evolution has no more credibility than the Loch Ness monster, despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary.

    For that matter, how about "In God we trust" on my money? The Founding Fathers didn't put it there. That crap didn't come along until much later.
     
    #135     Feb 11, 2010
  6. I personally have never demanded that creationism be taught in science classes. My suggestion is simple. Teach no creationism, and no unprovable theory of the origin of life. Or teach them both. To favor one or the other, funded by taxpayer money, is essentially propagation by the government of one religious belief over another...and yes, atheism has already been designated by the courts as a religion.

     
    #136     Feb 11, 2010

  7. bother? ... i enjoy listening to birds chirp..


    true story
     
    #137     Feb 11, 2010
  8. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    Your definition of god just included ME as a god. FAIL! :D :D

    Obviously you believe in something that you can't even coherently define or describe. And you wonder why so many people disagree with you. :p
     
    #138     Feb 11, 2010
  9. You are not a god of your own thoughts?

    If not you, then whom?

    I believe in something that you don't believe in, just as a deaf from birth person doesn't believe in the value of music in their life...

     
    #139     Feb 11, 2010
  10. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    IOW you don't realize that evolution and abiogenesis are two separate things. There are many theists who believe in evolution.

    Like I said, the government already promotes monotheism over every other religious belief, in clear violation of the US Constitution. They've been doing it for decades.

    And if atheism is a religion, where's my tax exempt status?
     
    #140     Feb 11, 2010