Why Capitalism Is Failing

Discussion in 'Economics' started by Lucias, Nov 4, 2011.

  1. jprad

    jprad

    Disagree.

    The post WWII industrial boom was not a mirage. It was real and it raised the standard of living for those who were part of it.

    The mirage you're referring to isn't because of cheap energy, it was due to "cheap" credit that we've since found out to be damned expensive.
     
    #41     Nov 5, 2011
  2. To add to what Plyka says and to help me think about the future I make the following gross over-simplifications:

    Government AKA democracy is socialism by another name. If government shrinks, socialism shrinks and vice versa.

    The middle class is essentially the worker class (including unions). "Middle" is a politically correct description to hide the actual percentages.

    The American Dream is to keep the workers working instead of thinking. And it is really a dream for most of us.

    Debt is the new method of slavery since slaves have to be cared for. Debt slaves care for themselves mostly.

    By the way, I did buy gold circa 2001 near the turn and sold it about four years later. I don't own any currently since I doubt it will save us this time. The powers that be will make sure that it will not happen in my view.
     
    #42     Nov 6, 2011
  3. TGregg

    TGregg

    Nope. If one must ascribe something like this to capitalism, then one would be closer to truth to say capitalism is based on the idea of scarce resources, not unlimited. Capitalism tries to allocate resources in the most efficient manner possible as determined by the free market.
     
    #43     Nov 6, 2011
  4. piezoe

    piezoe

    Nope. Capitalism and free markets are separate concepts. Capitalism does not require free markets. Capitalism has nothing to do with allocation of resources.
     
    #44     Nov 6, 2011
  5. piezoe

    piezoe

    I'm having trouble understanding this. But don't bother to explain unless you want to. I had always thought the chief advantage of capitalism was that it avoided the obvious disadvantages of having capital and the means of production in the hands of the State.
     
    #45     Nov 6, 2011
  6. Never suggested otherwise.
     
    #46     Nov 6, 2011
  7. When has that ever truly been the case?

    "What's good for GM is good for America."

    There is little difference between the state having the means of production in its hands, and the owners of the means of production have the gov't in their hands.

    Same intersection, approached via different side streets.
     
    #47     Nov 6, 2011
  8. A very post-modern perspective.
     
    #48     Nov 6, 2011
  9. piezoe

    piezoe

    I understand your point of view now. Thank you.
     
    #49     Nov 7, 2011
  10. heypa

    heypa

    Small capitalism good.
    Large capitalism can get very bad.
    Think about it.
    The small must follow the rules.
    The large can make the rules.
     
    #50     Nov 7, 2011