Why Can’t We Talk About the Murder Wave?

Chicago Federal Courts will likely rule based on the precedent The NY Courts set.

 

Apples and oranges the way NY and other cities do it which is why ipatent wants The NY way.

 

Not necessarily.

 

Thats what her decision was based on and they did not overrule her overall ruling.

 

Most likely.

Terry vs Ohio would not be ruled constitutional if it was only applied to 90% black and brown people.

 

Did you make that number up?

 

Stop-and-frisk in New York means stop-and-frisk black and brown people.

 

No,I did not

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-and-frisk_in_New_York_City

"Ninety percent of those stopped in 2017 were African-American or Latino, mostly aged 14–24. Seventy percent of those stopped were later found to be innocent"

 

Why would the police do that if they didn't think it was the most efficient way to reduce crime?

 

What is efficient is not always constitutional.Stopping all crime would be way more efficient if the constitution didn't have to be followed.