Why Can’t We Talk About the Murder Wave?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ipatent, Dec 26, 2021.

  1. ipatent

    ipatent

    "As applied," try again.
     
    #51     Jan 1, 2022
  2. ipatent

    ipatent

    Only for the purpose of explaining disparate outcomes.
     
    #52     Jan 1, 2022
  3. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    Exactly,which is why I previously said stop and frisk all races equally.

    Stop-and-frisk is unconstitutional if its only done to black and brown people.
     
    #53     Jan 1, 2022
  4. ipatent

    ipatent

    You don't understand the law of constitutional review.
     
    #54     Jan 1, 2022
  5. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen


    Sure that's the purpose.

    Boring racists arise on ET fairly regularly and sooner or later I say their real name. They disappear, poof.
     
    #55     Jan 1, 2022
    Tony Stark likes this.
  6. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    You don't understand the constitution and the law period.There is no stop and frisk the way you suggested because 2 Federal Courts ruled it unconstitutional.
     
    #56     Jan 1, 2022
    Bugenhagen likes this.
  7. ipatent

    ipatent

    Terry v. Ohio is still the Supreme Court law. Eric Adams is bringing back a modified form of stop & frisk in NYC.
     
    #57     Jan 1, 2022
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I suggest you go read the Terry vs. Ohio 392 US 1 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court which stated stop and frisk is completely constitutional.
     
    #58     Jan 1, 2022
  9. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    Not as NYP applied it and iPatent suggested it.
     
    #59     Jan 1, 2022
  10. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    It is,but it cant be applied only to 90% black and brown people.
     
    #60     Jan 1, 2022
    Bugenhagen likes this.