Why Can’t We Talk About the Murder Wave?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ipatent, Dec 26, 2021.

  1. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    All races equally.
     
    #41     Jan 1, 2022
  2. ipatent

    ipatent

    In high crime neighborhoods.
     
    #42     Jan 1, 2022
  3. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    Where everyone open carries as is their Gop given right.
     
    #43     Jan 1, 2022
  4. ipatent

    ipatent

    Depends on the state.
     
    #44     Jan 1, 2022
  5. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    That would violate the 14th amendment.If we are going to violate the constitution to lower the murder rate we should ban guns in The US.
     
    #45     Jan 1, 2022
  6. ipatent

    ipatent

    Citation?
     
    #46     Jan 1, 2022
  7. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    Well now, it's a federal right so that has to change.

    Instead of just skirting around with these boring common racist's topics, just lay out your plan to remove blacks from the USA. You have made it clear that you feel they are inferior and not fit for living along nice white and Asian people.

    So what's the plan Sam? Back to Africa or extermination?
     
    #47     Jan 1, 2022
  8. ipatent

    ipatent

    Treating them as individuals.
     
    #48     Jan 1, 2022
  9. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark






    In 2013, US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin found that New York's stop-and-frisk strategy focused too heavily on black and Hispanic people and was carried out too often without reasonable suspicion.

    As a result, she ruled that New York's stop-and-frisk policy was unconstitutional "as applied." Scheindlin specifically said she was not ordering New York to end stop-and-frisk, but instead, she ordered the city's police to reform their training and policing procedures to, among other things, make sure that officers do not engage in racial profiling when determine who to stop. She also appointed a monitor to oversee how the department was carrying out her orders.

    Scheindlin's ruling was highly controversial. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals halted enforcement of the reforms she had ordered and returned the case to a lower court for further review. The appeals court also took unusual step of removing her from the case.

    But the appellate court did not overturn her ruling that the way the city was carrying out stop-and-frisk was unconstitutional, since it violated Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

    It is also true that the way stop-and-frisk was carried out in New York -- tactics that Giuliani touted as helping to "change New York City from the crime capital of America to the safest large city in the country" -- is still considered illegal.
     
    #49     Jan 1, 2022
    Bugenhagen likes this.
  10. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    But scientifically categorised through their generic limitations. I get you.
     
    #50     Jan 1, 2022