Why Can’t We Talk About the Murder Wave?

Which of us cares about the murder and other victims more?

 

In other words violate the constitution.Just say that.

 

It doesn't violate to Constitution to concentrate stop & frisk in high crime neighborhoods, which are black and brown. You wanted an equal number of Asians and whites to be stopped.

 

I do.Ask black and brown people do they support stop and frisk

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/17/nyregion/bloomberg-stop-and-frisk-new-york.html

 

The way NYPD did stop and frisk violated The Constitution.2 Federal Courts have settled that.

 

Stop-and-frisk works. Democrats condemn legal practices that reduce crime at their peril.
Those who benefit most from stop-and-frisk are law-abiding minorities. And anyone who is stopped and frisked who hasn’t committed a crime has nothing to fear.
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/s...e-democrats-attack-mike-bloomberg/4856378002/

 

You've backtracked from what you said earlier about stopping and equal number of whites and Asians.

 

So would more gun regulations.If we are going to violate the constitution to stop gun violance Id rather do it in a way that stops them from getting the guns.Thats better and safer for the cops,potential victims and even the gang members.

 

I said thats what I wanted and still do.

 

Yes,we should all give up our rights to the government since we aren't criminals.