Why Can’t We Talk About the Murder Wave?

She did not rule they had to stop doing it,she said they had to do it constitutionally.

 

You don't understand how these things work.

 

It means going from over 500,000 stops per year to 13,000 stops per year.

 

500,000 plus stops to 13,000.You're the one who doesn't seem to understand how these things work.

 

Political pressure, not an injunction.

 

Funny how you liked WSJ when backing the Asian Harvard cases but now you accuse them of lying about stop and frisk

 

On November 9, 2013, the city asked a federal appeals court to vacate Scheindlin's orders.[34][35] On November 22, 2013, the federal appellate court rejected the city's motion for a stay of the judge's orders.[36]

 

The only order I've seen referenced is for a written policy.

 

I recall reading something about the number of stops dropping massively when more comprehensive paperwork had to be submitted, presumably involving what constitutionally acceptable reasons the officers had for the action.

This seems to have resulted in the practice continuing a fair bit just not being recorded.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...officers-underreporting-use-of-stop-and-frisk