Why Can’t We Talk About the Murder Wave?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ipatent, Dec 26, 2021.

  1. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    Thats what courts do
     
    #121     Jan 2, 2022
  2. ipatent

    ipatent

    If there was no injunction against stop and frisk, NYPD was free to continue.
     
    #122     Jan 2, 2022
  3. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    upload_2022-1-2_17-28-35.png


    upload_2022-1-2_17-30-11.png
     
    #123     Jan 2, 2022
  4. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark





    "New York City can move forward with a court-ordered overhaul of the police tactic known as stop and frisk after a federal appeals court Friday rejected an attempt by police unions to block the changes."
     
    #124     Jan 2, 2022
  5. ipatent

    ipatent

    If this all happened before 2014, why did you cite the 90% black and brown people from 2017? Obviously, there was no injunction. The issue was probably whether NYPD has to produce written guidelines.
     
    #125     Jan 2, 2022
  6. ipatent

    ipatent

    This language is not from a court decision.
     
    #126     Jan 2, 2022
  7. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    They went from over 500,000 stops per year to 13,000 stops per year.You figure it out.
     
    #127     Jan 2, 2022
  8. ipatent

    ipatent

    If there was an injunction it would have dropped to zero.
     
    #128     Jan 2, 2022
  9. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    "On August 12, 2013, Judge Scheindlin ruled that the police department had violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting unreasonable searches and the Fourteenth Amendment by systematically conducting stops and frisks in a racially discriminatory manner.[8]"
     
    #129     Jan 2, 2022
  10. ipatent

    ipatent

    The ruling means nothing without an injunction or other remedy. All we have from you so far is that she ordered a written policy.
     
    #130     Jan 2, 2022
    gwb-trading likes this.