Only an ignorant and uneducated person would have written what you did so what's wrong with telling it like it is? The "dictionary definition" applied as I did makes a lot of sense... if you're not capable of understanding that then I can't help you. You're arguing something else dimwit.
It's right here and it's airtight in outing and owning you. So I'm not surprised you're running away, coward. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2384759#post2384759
You stupid low life piece of shit how many languages can you use you freak?? Tell me how many languages you are functional at? Taking on ESL person for this?? Plaque vs. plague? Man you are sad. HOW MANY LANGUAGES DO YOU USE???
You're totally missing the point I've been making. Your definition might be good for the purpose of promoting your point of view - but if the definition in itself is stupid, does it hold much merit just because it helps you in the attack of another member? The definition is a bad definition of racism because it simply makes a lot of people racists. Racism is when you grant once race more rights than another, or if you think people should be dead because you hate their race. You're not a racist by saying that races are different.
No, you're missing my point and again, it's not MY definition. I was applying it to cesspool's comment. Are you saying this is not a racist statement? Let's vote for a black guy because we all know how well blacks (generally speaking) can manage their affairs. The whole Africa is kind of testimony for that.
Isn't America/Europe the reason why Africa is messed up? Divided them up into arbitrary nations... Great job. That's like forbidding a slave to read and then criticizing him for being illiterate.