Why Bush Needs To Be Recalled

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by gamalruach, Mar 21, 2004.

  1. Bush needs to be recalled (impeached). Here is why...

    As successful traders we need to keep track of world events and policies that effect not only markets in which we trade but economies. We need to form firm determinations and base our trades upon those decisions grounded in our equipoise and proper judgment.

    First let me be clear: I do NOT support terrorism in any form(s) or guise. I am AGAINST terrorism and its ways to try to influence mass thinking.

    Having said that, I am persuaded that, in the leaning of George Soros regarding George Bush, GB needs to be recalled.

    Not only that, but he needs to be held personally accountable for the deaths of the US and allies militaries during his ordered occupation period, tried as a criminal in the world court, in addition to being tried for the deaths of ALL innocents who suffered harm and death due to his ordering the US military to Afganistan and Iraq where 1000s of innocent people have been slaughtered by the weaponry of the US and the allies who were influenced unrightly by GB and his staff.

    Also, he and his direct staff need to be personally sued by those innocent families who suffered wrongful deaths and wounding.

    This will send a clear message to the future generations of presidents of the USA.

    It will clearly say: Even angels, who once went to God seeking permission to destroy "Evil" people in the Earth, the wisdom of God denied that request, saying,

    "...Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.

    "Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn." Mathew 13:29.30.

    The message it will clarify is this: Both good and bad dwell on this planet. Mankind is the reason for this, not God. Yet God Himself, and only God, has appointed a day ("in the time of harvest" - Judgement Day) in which He Himself will make all final determinations among great causes towards nations, as Bush seeks to do regarding creating wars and endless death of people of other nations in his ongoing attempt to root out "Evil" from among people, making final judgement(s) (that only God can and should make) against nations and people.

    This entire structure of "pre-emptive strikes" is a single shade away from The Inquisition in the Middle Ages, that was also founded in spiritual doctrine that was WAY off from sound life-sustaining principles.

    Furthermore, Bush's regime and policy of ridding the globe of anything and everything (human beings) that he and his staff have reserved divine rights unto themselves to loosely interpret as "terrorists" or a cause of "terrorism" is so closely aligned to acts of terrorism itself that it is literally causing divisions of peoples and nations as people cannot divide the two apart, and that blurred line may cause massive turmoil to the economies of nations - that, in itself, has potential to cause more harm (financially) to individual people, as global economies shift out of balance in response to Bush's continued pursuit and policies, than all wars and isolated random acts of terrorism have caused to date.

    The main principle here is this: No one leader can jet out in differential from among the UN and NATO and OPEC, etc., to undertake separate massive military endeavors. No one no matter what title they wear in whatever nation.

    It is evident now, as we see nations' leaders stating that they went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan under false presumption and lies, that Bush did NOT act in alliance with UN members.

    It is also holding true that his war against Iraq was done in false signals that tried to tie terrorism and Saddam/Iraq together.

    No leader can afford to jeopardize the overall well-being of his own nation's populous or others by making massive military strikes under false, fast and furious, knee-jerk reaction/reason(s) by overreacting to a single isolated event (such as 9/11).

    Also, Bush's entire structure of pre-emptive strikes against nations that are questionable as they pertain to WOMD and how those nations in question may in the future someday be harmful to innocent people is NOT founded in sound global what is best for everyone policy.

    When all is said and done Bush and his staff are equal to government seat-shiners/workers, similar to post office staff - they all just hold temporary government jobs, and in no wise do any of them hold the proper creditials to make such catestrophic global decisions that require much more wisdom and understanding than these mere government job shufflers embody.

    In conclusion, the mistakes and errors Bush and Blair have done cannot be undone, however, more sound structure can be put in place, that will pertain to all future leaders of not only America but other nations, that the world must act in a fully united way to determine what is and is not harming people globally, and act OR refrain from acting accordingly.

    Unless Bush is recalled, the USA's equities and currency pricing may very well suffer massive unbalances contrary to the sentiment and agreement of G-7, G-10 and G-20, that will in turn create huge economic havoc soon in the markets and related economies of nations.

    We MUST impeach Bush and replace him with a leader and staff that has a sane and sound policy towards doing what is best for not only Americans but ALL people under the sun.

  2. mktman


    Who do you suggest?


    How about Ted Kennedy?
    A yea just what we need.

    Keep in mind Clinton admin had opps to take out Bin Laden and the mastermind of most of the bombing in Iraq now.
    If Bill wasnt so busy $#%^&* Monica maybe he would have done the right thing and saved the world from all this.

    Every pres has major faults.

    So everything is cumulative.

  3. Phreedm


    Uh oh....ET has been infiltrated by a member of the "DemocraticUnderground".

    This opening post proves the saying "If you're 18, and not a democrat, you haven't a heart. If you're 30 and not a republican, you don't have a brain".
  4. Unhappily Kerry like Bush is a satanist of Skulls and Bones: cult of death...

    An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones "

    Antony C. Sutton

    Antony C. Sutton was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and an economics professor at California State University , Los Angeles . He was the author of 21 books, including Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler .

    Breaking 170 years of secrecy, this intriguing exposé takes a behind-the-scenes look at Yale's mysterious society, the Order of the Skull and Bones, and its prominent members, numbering among them Tafts, Rockefellers, Pillsburys, and Bushes. Explored is how Skull and Bones initiates have become senators, judges, cabinet secretaries, spies, titans of finance and industry, and even U.S. presidents, including George W. Bush. This book reveals that far from being a campus fraternity, the society is more concerned with the success of its members in the postcollegiate world. Included are a verified membership list, rare reprints of original Order materials revealing the interlocking power centers dominated by Bonesmen, and a peek inside the Tomb, their 140-year-old private clubhouse.

  5. Baron???

    This is allowed to be in the Trading Forum because . . . ???

  6. so probably not even a socialist except for facade like Bush is a fake republican that not only spent even more than socialist government but also has been clearly preventing enquiry on saudi arabia notably the Ben laden family. Ben laden one of the main client of Carlyle Investment group whose Bush father has been at the head for 4 years and his friend James Baker is defending Saudi Arabia against the victims of 9/11 !

    James Baker Defending Saudis against 9-11 Families' Lawsuit


    "Saudis hire some of the toniest U.S. law firms to defend them against the landmark $1 trillion lawsuit on behalf of the victims of 9-11. So why is the plaintiff’s counsel ecstatic? Plus, new heat on radical imam"

    "April 16 - After months of working below the radar, a huge U.S. legal team hired by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has sprung into action and begun a major counteroffensive against a landmark lawsuit seeking $1 trillion in damages on behalf of the victims of the September 11 terror attacks.

    THE OPENING DEFENSE SALVO in what promises to be a bruising legal battle was fired last week when a trio of lawyers from Baker Botts, a prestigious Houston-based law firm, filed a motion on behalf of Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, the Saudi defense minister. The motion attacked the 9-11 lawsuit as a “broadside indictment of Saudi government, religion and culture.” It also argued that, as the third-ranking official of a foreign government, their client is immune from any U.S. legal action and that he should therefore be dismissed from the case altogether.

    But in laying out their arguments, Sultan’s U.S. lawyers also presented highly detailed new evidence of the Saudi government’s role in funneling millions of dollars to a web of Islamic charities that are widely suspected by U.S. officials of covertly financing the operations of Al Qaeda and other international terrorist groups."


    "Baker Botts, Sultan’s law firm, for example, still boasts former secretary of State James Baker as one of its senior partners. Its recent alumni include Robert Jordan, the former personal lawyer for President Bush who is now U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia."
  7. This is what happens when the powers that be go around screaming WAR, yet show no intentions of conducting a WAR.

    Crying war, without following through, is nothing more than extortion.

    Yes, the current administration needs to be benched for dropping the ball and loosing the game.
  8. Phreedm


    Loosing what game?


    OMG, Saddam. Osama, KILL! KILL! KILL!
  10. Phreedm


    OK..try not to be too emotional, but exactly how did we loose the war? Seems to me, WW3 contiinues.
    #10     Mar 21, 2004