You're contradicting yourself. On the top you say "supply side only invests when there's demand" on the bottom you say "it only works in areas of innovation". Can't have it both ways. As you mention, producers are always competing and trying to improve. They shouldn't be constrained. I'm starting to think you're just playing devils advocate but don't actually believe what you say. If socialism were a great solution we'd be buying all the stuff we need from government run stores. We don't, there's a good reason why... the free market works far better. Now go away and stop bothering me, this horse has been beaten way beyond death
He makes a good point sir newwldmn And you never provided me a response btw... in that other thread... when I explained to you how Joe and The Dem's "hoodwinked" Democracy. Did you vote for Kamala in the primaries? ~case closed
innovation is a tiny part of the total production. Tesla didn’t start making 1mm electric cars until they knew 1.1mm people wanted to buy electric cars. They made 50 roadsters. Innovation comes from all sources including increased constraints. We have super efficient cars because of government regulations on emissions. Show me one story of innovation coming from overall lower tax rates. Don’t confuse this with comparative tax credits like the EV credit because that would prove my point.
Oh, and speaking of nuance (again), tax cuts don't pay for themselves. https://www.crfb.org/blogs/tax-cut-extension-only-pays-1-14-itself Even Big Al agrees: https://money.cnn.com/2017/11/10/investing/greenspan-tax-cuts-mistake-debt/index.html So much for all that trickle and supply, eh? Reminds me of what John Kenneth Galbraith observed about your trickle supply (side) economics: “...the less than elegant metaphor that if one feeds the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.”
How's he crying? He's making a legit point. Biden won the primaries, and then he was pushed out. They knew all along. Had Biden not run, and had it been an open primary, no way Kamala would have won. But here we are. We have a two party system, where one candidate was picked by party elites, and not the voters. It is what it is. You can babble on and on, all day, but facts don't lie. Case closed.