It only proves that they oppose the war anno 2007. In 2003, they certainly did not oppose the war. Jews can easily oppose the war now (they want a new one against Iran), as their interests are no longer threatened by Iraq. March 2003 poll by Gallup. That proves that most Jews supported the war. But even if they didn't, that wouldn't change the fact that we went to war for Israel - simply because the Zionist Neocons believed that America should go to war for Israel, as I have extensively documented in previous posts. Iraq was a war for Israel. It's a 100% provable fact. I defy you to search for valid argumentation to contradict this fact.
Borat, what part of the quote do you not understand? "American Jews were far less enthusiastic about going to war in 2003 than were other Americans (Only 50-some percent supported the war as opposed to 75% of the general public)." http://www.juancole.com/2007/02/american-jews-blacks-fiercest-opponents.html And it's coming from Juan Cole - known Jew/Israel hater.
Jews play both sides of the political fence. They control both Democrats and Republicans. Many of those currently opposed voted FOR action to topple Saddam. It's easy for them to backtrack now, knowing there won't be a withdrawal anytime soon. 50-some percent, actually 56%, of Jews in America supporting the war constitutes a majority, and that was all I said. Reread my post. I never stated that an "overwelming majority" of American Jewry supported the war. When the war was proposed, polls showed about the same percentage of Jews for and against it as in the general population, although most Jews supported the war. Since then, opinion has turned against the war, and most people, Jewish and otherwise, of both party affiliations are now opposed. The Zionist core, however, remains strongly loyal. We also note that most support for the war sprung up from the Christian right, the Republican voter base. The policy wonks formulating the foreign policy dependant on this war are the neocons, the Republican faction currently in power. The neocon ideological leadership is almost exclusively Jewish, such as William Kristol of The Weekly Standard, Jonah Goldberg and David Frum of the National Review, Charlse Krauthammer, and many others. The neocons are actually Trotskyite Jews, sort of like socialists with nice stock portfolios. Their political leadership is well-mixed with Gentiles, as we can see from the almost exclusively gentile Bush Administration. The only prominent Jews are the two secret police chiefs, Negroponte and Chertoff. The strategic leadership is another cabal again, consisting of men like Douglas Feith, Elliot Abrams, and Richard Perle. They belong to a think tank called The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, and this group produced the outline for Middle Eastern policy, summarized in a White Paper entited A Clean Break, which can be seen here: http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm Note the signatories: Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser. These are all Likudnik Jews, and leading lights of the neocon bloc within the Republican Party. All except for Meyrav Wurmser went on to take low-profile but high-influence advisory positions in the first George Bush administration. The policy is focused on securing Israeli interests in the region. When we say that the invasion of Iraq was a war for the Jews. This is what we mean. We do not literally mean "For all the Jews". We do not mean this is a war demanded en masse by the Jews in America - although admittedly we sound like that sometimes. The real situation is a bit more complex. Nevertheless, the Zionists in America are responsible for this illegal war, and you are unable to prove the contrary.
We? It's not that I am unable to... - first of all it's impossible to prove a negative and any reasonable adult knows that. I could just as easily claim that the war in Iraq was for Africa because Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice were part of the administration and ask you to prove the contrary. - more importantly though most people find it below their dignity to debate a modern version of the Protocols with human filth like you. This, not a lack of arguments, is the main reason why almost no one responds to your posts.
Colin Powell and Rice have no history of promoting African nationalism. They didn't write a paper calling for war with Iraq, and they didn't fabricate lies about weapons of Mass Destruction with aid of an African county, Nor has the Iraq war benifited Africa in any way. Neoconservative Zionists did all these things. One minute is all it took to refute crap like that. Please come up with more of it! I will quote myself and I shall await your next idiotic post.
Colin Powell and Rice ... didn't write a paper calling for war with Iraq They did not write a paper indeed, they invaded Iraq instead. they didn't fabricate lies about weapons of Mass Destruction Really? Colin Powell...the UN presentation... Condoleezza Rice... "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." Neoconservative Zionists did all these things. Together with neoconservative Christians who don't represent Christianity, together with neoconservative blacks who don't represent Africa or african americans, together with neoconservative muslims and arabs (like Ahmed Chalabi and Co) who don't represent arabs or Islam. together with Italian Americans who don't represent Catholicism. So yes, together with all of them there were several neoconservative jews who don't represent american jews, Israel or Zionism. One minute is all it took to refute crap like that. You had nothing to refute as I did not make the claim that the war was for Africa because a few blacks were involved. Quite the opposite, I wanted to show the utter stupidity of such claims and the idiocy of your argument that the war was for Israel because several jews were involved. But you're too dumb to understand even that. Anyway, I am through with you for now. Too many degenerates, too little time.
The leaders of the Neoconservative movement are Zionists. They fabricated the evidence to invade Iraq and they fooled/brainwashed their lower ranks by doing so. It's clear that your reading skills are on the level of a 5 year old child. Because of that, there is no point in continuing this conversation. In addition, it's quite annoying for a civilized person to debate with lying Jewish parasites. Keep telling yourself that "the world was created for me" (Sanhedrin 37a). "The land of Israel was created first, then the rest of the world...