Whoa Baby! What happened?

Discussion in 'Index Futures' started by abishiai, Feb 4, 2003.

  1. McCloud

    McCloud

    IB:

    To all traders
    Tue Feb 4 16:45:53 2003 EST

    Globex Trading Update

    Globex has just notified us they are breaking
    all trades in ESH3 executing above 860.00 between 16:00 and 16:15 EST.
    ====================================================
     
    #41     Feb 4, 2003
  2. cheeks

    cheeks

    I think that is fair.
     
    #42     Feb 4, 2003
  3. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    it is a conspiracy to mess up my beautiful hand draw trend line.
     
    #43     Feb 4, 2003
  4. That's quite a meal. Probably some first-day-on-the-job clerk.
     
    #44     Feb 4, 2003
  5. I disagree. But since all the "electronic exchange" casinos seem to be operating like this, I suppose I am in the minority.

    If I buy 2000 shares instead of 200, do you think anyone breaks my trade?

    Fair would be to have clients check their orders before they send them to the exchange, and if they fail, it should be their own loss. They could buy "moron clerk insurance" for scenarios like that. It should not be the exchanges' concern.
     
    #45     Feb 4, 2003
  6. ZBEAR

    ZBEAR

    Seems that there should be some FAIL SAFE code in the Globex programs to avoid those types of moves ???

    Guess that's a Logical thought - therefore
    that's exactly "Why" it ISN'T in place.
     
    #46     Feb 4, 2003
  7. Quah

    Quah

    I agree with Lobster. Busting the trades is BS IMO. For all we know, it wasn't accidental, the "originator" might have thought he had some inside news on Saddam being killed or something. Who says the trades were entered in error?
     
    #47     Feb 4, 2003
  8. I find that reasoning logical, too. I suggested it on here in the case of ISLD. The point is if you are going to bust trades based solely upon price action, it is your responsibility to do everything you can (like add some 20 bytes of code to the matching algorithm) to prevent these trades from printing in the first place.
     
    #48     Feb 4, 2003
  9.  
    #49     Feb 4, 2003
  10. This same thing happened on Eurex not too long ago. You would think they would learn from others mistakes.
     
    #50     Feb 4, 2003