So now the real lunatic is coming out of the closet, right? Hahaha Are you hitting your head against a wall right now? Because it feels like that. You didn't want to provide your code example but you get crazy as hell that now someone else is doing the same to you. lol There is nothing wrong. The code doesn't have problems. Maybe your code has problems. And that is driving you nuts. Tell me what is wrong in your view and I'll post the code. I have posted a few results right now. You have provided nothing at all since then. Nothing. Why are you that shy with your results. That's the real fishy issue. BTW regarding your 2 bars idiocy. This is a reply I got from T.J. An in regards to BarsInTrade object of custom backtest interface in comparison to #bars column. So Billy boy, just use this CBT code in addition to your code to see that barsintrade outputs 1 in this our case as it starts counting from 0. Code: SetOption("ExtraColumnsLocation", 13 ); SetCustomBacktestProc(""); if( Status("action") == actionPortfolio ) { bo = GetBacktesterObject(); bo.Backtest(1); // iterate through closed trades for( trade = bo.GetFirstTrade(); trade; trade = bo.GetNextTrade() ) { bit = trade.barsintrade; trade.AddCustomMetric("BIT", bit); } bo.ListTrades(); }
Why don't you post the code and results as Bill asked to give an end to this? I have Amibroker and I can verify your results if you post the code. Then we can all agree that Bill is wrong.
No, I want Bill to participate. He's claimed something without facts. So I kindly asked him but he denied. It's his turn now. I've already provided facts. And additional facts by Tomasz himself. And you can't be serious that you can not code 5 lines
here is another result list and using 1 MSFT share SetPositionSize( 1, spsShares ); Where is the blow up?
And Billy boy, just FYI, if you want your own #bars column per your rules then simply use the custom backtest interface. Then in your system that exits at open after previous bar that was entry bar (entry at close) then if your intention is to count that as 0 bar you get a 0 bar column and profit/bit is not executable then because it's division by zero See BIT and Profit/BIT columns. Hahahaha
An here it exits not at next bar's open but at open after next So I guess as per your definition this should be 1 bar in trade. So here it is.
funnyguy take your juvenile shit elsewhere already. we're trying to have intelligent debate here on the merits of MS. +1 for AmiBroker. I jettisoned MS years ago for AB and never looked back.
Yeah Billy boy, another sock puppet account of yours? We are debating but unfortunately without any results from funnybill that would finish all of that. But he likes to be imprecisely. Billy wanted to see results and fact. So I provided them. BTW, where is the intelligence in your sentences? I can't find it.
Since you still don't get it. No wonder, Tech Analyzers are all slow. He claimed there were issues so I have asked him privately to present an example. He strangely denied and instead wanted ME to post results in this thread. Then because of his stupidity and inability to precisely describe what he is even looking for the never ending story started. But it seems the quoted words of Tomasz Janeczko have finally silenced is clueless mouth. And actually I have fun to needle him.
OK, good news I stop here but for only one reason that is to not harm Mr. Janeczko. He doesn't deserve it. Peace over and out.