You don't know anything about that. You've just made an "assumption"....wrong one, too. If you want to be respected you need to be careful about how you run your mouth, don't you think?
Granted, he's got some warts. Personally I think we need to consider where he comes from. But at least he apears to not be a Lefty-Commie, Hell-bent on destroying our country. That's my view.
Threats, taking it up a level I see, psychology knows no bounds "All Roads Lead to Rome", which then leads to why you are answering on behalf of Xela, but that will distract from original point of the thread so perhaps I can kindly suggest we cease that direction from continuing.
Me too. I also wish everyone would be honest when they are trying to scam me. But not how the real world works. Hehe. And I wish women could not be so crazy and just don't talk so much. Hehe.
So... in your mind, someone pointing out that you've made an error in judgement is "Threat, taking it up a level"? WTF is wrong with you?
I think this thread is developing into the discussion of the users, which imho is a big negative. OP can ignore or block based on his own preferences but the discussion and suggestions of who to reminds me of the quote: “Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, and little minds discuss people.”
You just couldn't leave it alone, I see your Trump narrative "Personally I think we need to consider where he comes from", interesting, we can come back to this later. Now, let's ask the simple question, how do you in a verifiable way know Xela is either an accredited investor or accredited trader, for that matter how does anyone know you are an accredited investor or accredited trader. It's the margin of error rule, simple but effective. Dear newbie traders, there is a very interesting fact about life, if there was a margin of error evolution of species would not exist. The financial markets are based on a simple false narrative, open pricing, and have perfected the ability to hide any anomalies to a microscopic level, however. They are there, and they exist primarily at the beginning (less than -3) and end (more than +3) on the curve, the problem is the middle of a normal distribution where those discrepancies cannot be seen due to the, let's call it noise. In there you have to work like an imbecile, with higher risk, and lower return, it is called income. You see the discrepancy, and are trying to work out what it is as an angle, don't worry I get it. This should be good.
But I like the idea. It seems helpful if there was a score table showing how many times a member is being ignored and a summary of reasons for this.